Talk:Cyclone Olaf
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Former good article nominee | Cyclone Olaf was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather , which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Assessment
[edit ]Reduced to start because this is in drastic need of some reorganization and copyediting. Strongly recommend delisting from GAN since there is no cite web formatting. --Core des at 04:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
- Actually, I went on and failed it, for the reasons below. --Core des at 05:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
Failed "good article" nomination
[edit ]This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2006, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Fail, needs a thorough copyedit. There is also speculation ("it could have been worse if it hit American Samoa directly").
- 2. Factually accurate?: Fail, no cite web-formatted references
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Eh, weak pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images?: Fail due to lack of organization.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --Core des at 05:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
Sources
[edit ]Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- Start-Class Weather articles
- Mid-importance Weather articles
- Start-Class Tropical cyclone articles
- Mid-importance Tropical cyclone articles
- WikiProject Tropical cyclones articles
- WikiProject Weather articles
- Start-Class Polynesia articles
- Low-importance Polynesia articles
- Start-Class Cook Islands articles
- Low-importance Cook Islands articles
- Cook Islands articles
- WikiProject Polynesia articles