Talk:Crosstalk
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
I remember getting crosstalk on a line when I was younger (1995) - does anybody know if this is able to happen any more? --^pirate 20:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Reply
Most certainly. I think the article should mention twisted-pair shielded cabling since this the most common method of combating crosstalk in cabling. One could even mention trace inductance on circuit boards. Rmcii 05:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Reply
95% of electronics is digital. It is weird that crosstalk in digital systems is ignored here. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x147.pdf . Ivor Catt109.151.24.231 (talk) 11:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Reply
The description of the Zurich club xtalk should be linked to from the disambiguation page, if at all. It's certainly not related to the electronics meaning of crosstalk. LouScheffer 14:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Reply
I wonder if we could add a paragraph on crosstalk on magnetic tape media - i.e. between the A-side and B-side of audio cassettes. — TheHerbalGerbil (TALK), 05:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC) Reply
- You're talking about Print-through. I've added a See also link. -—Kvng 15:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Reply
- No, print-through is a different phenomenon. Print-through is crosstalk caused by one winding of tape on a reel magnetising the ones above and below it (causes pre/post-echo). I'm pretty sure Herbal Gerbal is talking about spillover between sides (adjacent tracks) due to oversaturation (which, incidentally, can also cause print-through) or more commonly from misaligned record or playback heads.--MXocrossIIB (So, you were saying?); 20:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Reply
The usage and primary topic of crosstalk and cross-talk cross-talk is under discussion, see talk:crosstalk (disambiguation) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC) Reply
GeneC1 (talk ·contribs ) has proposed merging PSNEXT into this article. ~Kvng (talk) 14:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Reply
- I Support the proposal. Text of PSNEXT can be added to Crosstalk §In cabling. ~Kvng (talk) 14:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Reply
Done ~Kvng (talk) 16:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Reply
- C-Class electrical engineering articles
- Low-importance electrical engineering articles
- Electrical engineering articles
- C-Class electronic articles
- Mid-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles
- C-Class Professional sound production articles
- Low-importance Professional sound production articles
- WikiProject Professional sound production articles
- C-Class Telecommunications articles
- Low-importance Telecommunications articles