Talk:Consequence argument

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject icon

Philosophy : Metaphysics / Science Low‐importance

WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
Taskforce icon	Metaphysics
Taskforce icon	Philosophy of science

Lewis’ Response

[edit ]

Latest comment: 5 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

One of the most well known responses is that of David Lewis, called the Local Miracle Compatibilism If anyone who understands this argument well could add to this, please do. If not then I will add my own soon. Many thanks, Phil Philosotics (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Reply

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Consequence_argument&oldid=1349308274"