Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Consejo popular

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Cuba
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Cuba task list:

Task list

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
[edit ]

should there be two pages for the town and the consejo popular, they are at the same location but are two different things. ex Birán is both a hamlet and consejo popular, should it be split into two and stay as just one. also muncipalities, should they be split into a municipality and the main town or just stay as a page for both? CubanoBoi (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Are quotations Xokay to stay

[edit ]

I think that the quotation actually makes sense in this context, even if it is lengthy, with that said, we could paraphrase it and explain it that way if it fits better? J.m.novvak (talk) 10:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

I don't think there needs to be an entire section of the constitution in this article. It should be paraphrased imo. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 12:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Question

[edit ]

In several pages of Consejos populares of Cuba, the ward isn’t mentioned as one on the official website, but is on other sources. I believe that it’s likely they have changed them from over time, but there is no source that has said it. Just in Camajuaní, there is 4 of these, being Sagua la Chica, La Quinta, Vega de Palma, and Sabana. Should these "wards" be mentioned as former wards, or as disputed, or never a ward? Sources for them being a ward:Not said, but there is 13 wards in Camajuaní on the map instead of 9 on pg. 4, 5, seen on map, mentions Vega de Palma as a ward, mentions it having 13 wards, etc. While the official website for the municipality saids there’s 9 https://www.soycamajuani.gob.cu/es/nuestra-region/region-camajuani/sobre-nosotros. This is not only Camajuaní, with Dos Hermanas in Encrucijada not appearing or being mentioned as a ward on most sources, but is mentioned as one on the official website https://www.somosencrucijada.gob.cu/delegados/34-politica-y-gobierno/delegados/86-consejo-popular-dos-hermanas/amp. CubanoBoi (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /