Talk:Christianity in Turkey

I judge the article to be merged as significant enough to exist separately. Sarcelles (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Reply

• I would agree with the proposed merger Tim P (talk) 18:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC) Reply

• The heading 'Roman Catholicism in Turkey' is inaccurate being that Eastern Catholic Churches, not Roman Catholics, appear to be in the majority in Turkey. The merger may be good but must represent the Orthodox Churches as well under the 'Christianity in Turkey' heading. The Eastern Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarchate is based in Istanbul and has been for about 1700 years.Jc3schmi (talk)

• I'm against the merger, because as both articles increase in length, it would be necessary to divide them again. --Pgecaj (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Reply

• I am against the merger. Same reasons of Pgecaj. Furthermore, Roman catholicism in Turkey is deeply connected with the Italian levantine(who historically reject protestantism).--Rew48 (talk) 02:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Reply

http://somosierra.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/christianity-on-trial-in-turkey/

http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,411043,00.html

--Krzyzowiec (talk) 19:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Reply

§== Number of (active) churches ==

I just wonder, how many are the active churches in Turkey? The article's introduction discusses what was long time ago. Hagia Sophia was a church, turned into a mosque. My simple question is how many temples function as churches. It is interesting to see different denominations also. 80.216.69.122 (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC) Hundreds of churches are active in Istanbul... really hundreds... And beautiful churches. You must see Istanbul and definitely you will be shocked. Hagia Sophia and Chora Monastery are symbolic conversions. Majority of the churches are untouched. This was the tradition of the time. Most of the European cathedrals are at the same site of the pagan temples as well. In Istanbul, you can find catholic, orthodox, georgian, armenian, bulgarian, russian etc Churches, you name it . When one looks at this page, It does not seem that anyone will come up to enlighten you and other people on this subject or on other subjects. Unfortunately I don't have time. And with the beautiful version of western vandalism, I don't think my writings (of an Istanbuler) would remain there.Reply

This word has no strict meaning and is a POV term.

The claim that 35,000 Turks converted to Christianity in 2008 is highly suspect. The citation leads to a message board and cannot be corroborated. This claim appears to have no basis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BCCF:58E0:7C8F:6C16:7288:C691 (talk) 01:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Christianity in Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore }} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots |deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110830131029/http://hr-action.org/thr/GRTURK.html to http://www.hr-action.org/thr/GRTURK.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC) Reply

The user has added a lot of claims that are not supported by sources. Also, many added sections were duplicates (already mentioned in other part of the articles).Ferakp (talk) 07:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christianity in Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link }} tag to http://www.kirche-in-not.de/01_aktuelles/meldungen_2006_tuerkische_christen_fuer_eu_beitritt.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203003227/http://www.worldevangelicalalliance.com/members/europe.htm to http://www.worldevangelicalalliance.com/members/europe.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck }}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christianity in Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520084230/http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&link=161291 to http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&link=161291

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Christianity in Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=161291
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160122003642/http://mobile.todayszaman.com/national_visit-to-antakya-shows-turkey-embraces-religious-diversity_226554.html to http://mobile.todayszaman.com/national_visit-to-antakya-shows-turkey-embraces-religious-diversity_226554.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041230070144/http://www.kirche-in-not.de/01_aktuelles/ to http://www.kirche-in-not.de/01_aktuelles
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150602021641/http://www.tao-klarjeti.ge/img_site/naxazebi/naxazebi_en.html to http://www.tao-klarjeti.ge/img_site/naxazebi/naxazebi_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Christianity in Turkey's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ipsos2017":

• From Demographics of Turkey: "Religion, Ipsos Global Trends". Ipsos. 2017. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
• From Turkey: "Religion, Ipsos Global Trends". Ipsos. 2017. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC) Reply

NOTHING?! Let's just take this one as a sample: Islamist Turkey seizes ALL Christian churches in city and declares them 'state property'. If you don't like the source, how about this then?. There are tons in those search results and that is only one instance of a single crime. Remember that political correctness does not belong in an encyclopedia, just as it does not belong in science or history. Do not confuse good manners with truth. I came here to read about it and because I found nothing, I had to search. Then when I began to get a picture of what is really true out there then I had to come back and remind writers to be fully honest here. Tell the whole truth, not what you want people to hear. MagnoliaSouth ^(talk) 22:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC) You are writing this, probably without seeing Cordoba in Spain, and none of the Mosques in Athens. Cordoba Mosque-Cathedral is full of paintings depicting the crimes against the humanity. So is the Prada Museum in Madrid. In Athens none of the historical mosques are functioning. There is one in the centrum Tzistarakis Mosque and it is Museum. King of Greece threw a ball in it once. on contrary Istanbul is full of beautiful active churches.Reply

The narration of the historical background jumps from the early Christianity to the late Ottoman Empire. So obviously the authors think they did not exist during the whole Ottoman Era in Turkey. The start of the article is also interesting mentioning their genocides. Well you can tell what you want. But during 1000 years did they exist? and Maybe thrived? thrived so that they were became the victims of genocide. I don't think anyone really cares about the timeline gaps or the logical fallacies . This is not a philosophy article anyway. Only religiously motivated people are welcome. Now one will come up and say there is already a separate article for the Christianity in Ottoman Empire. So is there a separate article about you name it. There is a separate article about Early Christianity, there is article about Antioch etc. But this article is a general article which connects the ancient Turkey, Ottoman Turkey, Turkish Republic and the Christianity. So there must be a mention for Christianity in Ottoman Empire. I mean if you want to be righteous. Or If you really care about the completeness or correctness. But If you want to motivate people to think how bad the Turks are, of course leave it as it is. And do more than that, delete the section that I added. Write what the hell the Turks did to whatever people in the world from Incas to Eskimos as well, but be honest and write that they treated them well in the Millet System during the Ottoman Empire. Read some Bernard Lewis first. I believe if one day Christian ISIS happens to exist, English wikipedia will be their handbooks.

The article says that The Eastern Orthodox Church has been headquartered in Constantinople since the 4th century, while the Eastern Orthodox Church is born in 1054 AD according to Roman Catholicism. The Orthodox position is different, but asserting one position instead of another is not in the Wikipedia standards. It could be changed into something like Pre-Schism Eastern Patriarchates and the Eastern Orthodox Church have been headquartered in Constantinople since the 4th century. --Ricky N.03 (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC) Reply

This edit changed the group title in a way that makes it less specific and accurate. I have changed it back, as in my reading the earlier Turkish Christians has a narrower meaning that better fits what is being summarised in the infobox. Christians in Turkey has a wider meaning: It's obviously related to, and encompasses, Turkish Christians, but the latter is more precise. (Subject to discussion if needed, and consensus, as always, of course.)49.177.64.138 (talk) 14:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC) Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• St. Barlaam Georgian Monastery of Antioch, Yayladağı, Hatay.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Reply