Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Boomerang Bet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proposed deletion This page was proposed for deletion by Absoulutelytamar(talk · contribs) on 1 June 2025.
It was contested by DualPendel(talk · contribs) on 2 June 2025 with the comment:
There is one very important news story and the owner of the company also has an article.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Articles for creation this draft on 18 November 2024 by reviewer Jamiebuba (talk · contribs)."}">icon
WikiProject icon This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation . The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Note icon
This article was acceptedfrom this draft on 18 November 2024by reviewer Jamiebuba(talk · contribs).
WikiProject icon Gambling
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Things you can do

  • Current collaborations:
Improve an article to FA
Improve an article to A
  • Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
  • Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling }} banner.
  • The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
  • Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Score exact entre la RD Congo et Botswana

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 months ago 2 comments1 person in discussion

Score exacte KalalaFrançois (talk) 05:41, 30 December 2025 (UTC) Reply

@Daniel KalalaFrançois (talk) 05:43, 30 December 2025 (UTC) Reply

Edit request: factual review of headquarters and partnership wording

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 days ago 2 comments2 people in discussion
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented.

Hello. I have a disclosed conflict of interest regarding this article, so I am not editing the article directly. I would appreciate it if an independent editor could review a few factual points and make any changes they consider appropriate under Wikipedia’s policies.

I would like to kindly ask for a review of the following:

1. Headquarters information

The article currently states that Boomerang Bet is headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus, and the infobox also lists:

"Headquarters: Limassol, Cyprus"

Could this please be reviewed and removed if there is no reliable public source supporting it?

My concern is that this information may be inaccurate or unsupported, and I would prefer the article not to include unsourced corporate-location details.

2. AC Milan partnership wording

The article currently says:

"In July 2024, Boomerang Bet became the official regional betting partner of AC Milan in Europe."

Would it be possible to adjust this wording to more closely reflect AC Milan’s official announcement? A more neutral version could be:

"In July 2024, AC Milan announced a regional partnership with Boomerang, naming Boomerang its Official Regional Betting Partner in Europe."

This wording seems more precise because the official announcement refers to Boomerang as the partner.

3. Alisha Lehmann wording

The article currently says:

"In August 2024, football player Alisha Lehmann became a brand ambassador for Boomerang Bet."

Could this sentence please be reviewed as well? The current wording may give readers the impression that this is an ongoing ambassador relationship. If the information is kept, perhaps it could be worded as a past, dated partnership and supported by reliable sources. If that is not appropriate, removal may be preferable.

Thank you very much for reviewing this request. I understand that independent editors will decide what, if anything, should be changed in accordance with Wikipedia’s policies.Rita Youper (talk) 22:39, 7 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Partly done: 1) I've removed the HQ info.
2) The linked source lead to a 404. Couldn't find another source. Removed entirely.
3) I rewrote it myself to be more neutral
Let me know if you have any more questions. - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 15:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /