Talk:Bonnet macaque

I rated this as "high" because I believe the species is common in documentaries and such begging for food from people. But maybe I overrated it. Rlendog (talk) 20:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

I'm bumping it to up to start class, and I'd have to say it deserves "Mid" at best. Personally, I've never heard of them in any documentaries I've seen. – VisionHolder « talk » 23:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Mid is good by VH's nifty new neato assessment scheme. :D - UtherSRG (talk) 06:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).

Would you please take a look at that here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins

And then correct this individual species article as necessary — I'm not sure which macaque species may have actually been called "[Name] Macaque" traditionally.

(And I hope you can see that the fact that I don't know that, after reading a Wikipedia article about the species, is why rewriting reality in Wikipedia is a problem.)

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

• Start-Class Primate articles
• Mid-importance Primate articles
• WikiProject Primates articles