Talk:Big Joe 1
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article should be merger with Big Joe (Mercury Project) as they are about the same test flight
[edit ]The title says it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.214.79.42 (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Let's discuss it below. OkayKenG (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Convince links (Merge of Big Joe (Project Mercury) with Big Joe 1), check out Wikipedia:Merging for help as well. Thanks! OkayKenG (talk) 02:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
Merger proposal
[edit ](Posted in per request of 128.214.79.42) 128.214.79.42 proposes to merge Big Joe (Project Mercury) into Big Joe 1. For the reason, "This article should be merger with Big Joe (Mercury Project) as they are about the same test flight" OkayKenG (talk) 03:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- I agree with the merger. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Bubba73: Sorry, moved your comment here so its under the subheading "Merger proposal". OkayKenG (talk) 03:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Bubba73 and OkayKenji: I also concur. There's no need to separate information on a launch vehicle from its sole flight, especially when the articles on the flight and the launch vehicle are essentially stubs. The information in both articles about this flight, and the launch vehicle used to fly it, would be much better presented to readers through a single, well-structured article. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 18:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Bubba73: Sorry, moved your comment here so its under the subheading "Merger proposal". OkayKenG (talk) 03:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC) [reply ]