Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Bhumi Pednekar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page .
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Articles for creation this draft on 8 April 2016 by reviewer 333-blue (talk · contribs)."}">icon
WikiProject icon This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation . The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Note icon
This article was acceptedfrom this draft on 8 April 2016by reviewer 333-blue(talk · contribs).
WikiProject icon Biography : Actors and Filmmakers
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers .
WikiProject icon India Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India , which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page .IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Women
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Requested move 24 April 2016

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 years ago 3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. G4 does not apply as the article is different enough to the one that was deleted. While it exists it should be at the proper title. Of course there is on prejudice against a new AfD, but it does seem she has won a notable award in the interim. Jenks24 (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC) Reply


Bhumi Pednekar (actress) → Bhumi Pednekar – No need for dab in title. Destination is create-protected, otherwise I'd move it myself. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2019

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

RELEASE DATE OF DUM LAGA KE HAISHA 2014 125.19.32.22 (talk) 13:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Done ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 13:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Bollywood in lead

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi @Krimuk2.0: I disagree with you here. Going down the tree of disambiguation, we would care about the nation first, then the language, then any sort of ethnic identification, if relevant, which I don't think it is. We should consider that not everybody in the world knows what Hindi is, and far fewer know what Telugu or Tamil or Odia are. Making the content understandable should be our first goal, and we likely wouldn't say "She appears in Odia films" because few non-Indians would know what that is. (And no, wikilinking isn't how we make content understandable.) "Odia-language" would be the correct compound adjective to describe the films that person appears in, and then the primary topic is the language, not the ethnic film industry. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Cyphoidbomb My understanding is that we link to Bollywood, which links to the appropriate film industry (which is where she works), where the user can find a wikilink to the language Hindi. Alternately, the opening statement might say, "...Indian film actress who works in Hindi-language films of Bollywood" to avoid confusion. However, the common practice in FA-articles, such as Kareena Kapoor, Preity Zinta, and Shah Rukh Khan has been to link to the industry and not the language. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC) Reply
@Krimuk2.0: Well, I don't plan to fight anybody here about it, and I hope you don't think I'm giving you a hard time specifically, but taking examples from the melting pot nation, Brad Pitt works in the Hollywood film industry, yet there is no link for that. No link for Woody Allen working in a culturally Jewish film industry. They are American actors, and if they produced films in a language other than English, the third level of our taxonomy would be language. Did Cheech Marin, whose films are in English, work in the Chicano film industry? Ethnic industry is not typically the focus. Anyhow, that's my opinion. It may be unpopular. Feel free to use it or ignore it. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC) Reply
That's because saying one is an "American actor" is sufficient, as America has only one film industry, and that's Hollywood. India has many: Bollywood, Telugu cinema], Tamil cinema, Cinema of West Bengal, and many others, which is why we can't compare American actors with Indian actors. Each of these industry is based on language, and that's obvious from the nomenclature. I still fail to see why it's being seen any different. There are proper wikipedia articles to these industries as opposed to a Jewish film industry or a Chicano film industry. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Merge Filmography and award tables

[edit ]
Latest comment: 2 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

It will be easier to see for which work she won the award. The way these tables are organized right now makes it difficult to see. 80.114.218.229 (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC) Reply

Proposal to add full name "Bhumi Satish Pednekkar" to the article

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 month ago 9 comments7 people in discussion
icon
This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I would like to propose adding the subject's full name, Bhumi Satish Pednekkar, to the lead of the article. Currently the article refers to her only as "Bhumi Pednekar," but multiple sources indicate her full name includes the middle name "Satish" and uses the spelling "Pednekkar."

Supporting sources:

I propose the lead sentence be updated to: "Bhumi Pednekar (born Bhumi Satish Pednekkar)..." and also request moving the article title to "Bhumi Satish Pednekkar" as her full and preferred name.

Requesting input from other editors before making the change. Thank you. Team meraseo (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

(削除) I fully support both proposals. (削除ここまで)
(削除) The sources provided clearly demonstrate that Bhumi Satish Pednekkar is her complete and legal name. Her verified Instagram, LinkedIn, recent media coverage, and IMDb all use or acknowledge "Bhumi Satish Pednekkar". She also appears to have made a conscious decision to include her father’s name "Satish" in professional contexts. (削除ここまで)
(削除) While "Bhumi Pednekar" has been her long-standing stage name, the evidence shows a clear shift toward using her full name. Per WP:NAMECHANGE and WP:COMMONNAME, when a subject adopts their full name and it is increasingly reflected in reliable sources, we should update the article title accordingly. (削除ここまで)
(削除) I recommend: (削除ここまで)
(削除) Moving the article to Bhumi Satish Pednekkar (削除ここまで)
(削除) Using the lead sentence: "Bhumi Satish Pednekkar (known professionally as Bhumi Pednekar) is an Indian actress..." (削除ここまで)
(削除) This approach is both accurate and respectful of her preference. Strong support. ~2026-31602-77 (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC) (削除ここまで) Strike sock comment In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 19:09, 14 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
(削除) Support. (削除ここまで)
(削除) The sources provided clearly show that Bhumi Satish Pednekkar is her full name and that she is actively using it across verified and reliable platforms. Since this name is now being reflected in multiple recent sources, updating the article title and lead would improve accuracy. (削除ここまで)
(削除) I support moving the article to Bhumi Satish Pednekkar and using "Bhumi Satish Pednekkar (known professionally as Bhumi Pednekar)" in the lead. This maintains recognizability while reflecting her current name usage. ~2026-32083-35 (talk) 12:13, 30 May 2026 (UTC) (削除ここまで) Strike sock comment In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 19:09, 14 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
  • Comment: While Bhumi Pednekar is the article name / WP:COMMONNAME, the name referred as Bhumi Satish Pednekkar can be used in the lead sentence only per MOS:FULLNAME or whatever it is, based on this third party source as well as the subject's verified Instagram handle, in my opinion. Everywhere throughout Wikipedia including the rest of this article, Bhumi Pednekar or Pednekar (per MOS:SURNAME) will be used. That being said, if @Team meraseo: is making a suggestion to move this article to this new name then first, you've to do a proper move request here (this one isn't). Secondly, I'd oppose it per WP:COMMONNAME. And third, it would require consensus from established editors with those in WP:ICTF project rather than temporary IDs like the above which I doubt are socks/meats created for this purpose only. Are these your IDs? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:45, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
icon
This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Thank you for your comments. I respectfully disagree that WP necessarily requires the title to remain "Bhumi Pednekar" if reliable sources increasingly identify the subject by her full name, Bhumi Satish Pednekkar.
  • The purpose of this discussion is not only to add the full name to the lead but also to consider whether the article title should reflect the subject's actual and verifiable name. Multiple sources, including the subject's verified social media profiles and independent publications, identify her as Bhumi Satish Pednekkar. I believe this evidence merits consideration for a title change through the appropriate process.
    Regarding the suggestion about other accounts, I can only speak for myself. My position is based on the sources presented and the accuracy of the article's title and content. Whether other editors support or oppose the proposal should be evaluated on the strength of their arguments and sources rather than assumptions about their identities.
    If a formal move request is required, I am willing to initiate one so that the community can evaluate the evidence and determine whether the title should remain "Bhumi Pednekar" or be moved to "Bhumi Satish Pednekkar." Team meraseo (talk) 09:02, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
(削除) Support (削除ここまで)
(削除) I support the proposal to add Bhumi Satish Pednekkar to the lead. The sources provided, including The Indian Express, Vogue India, ANI, and PETA India, demonstrate that the fuller name is being used by reliable publications. Additionally, the subject's verified Instagram account and professional LinkedIn profile indicate that "Bhumi Satish Pednekkar" is her current public and preferred name. (削除ここまで)
(削除) At a minimum, updating the lead to include the full name would improve accuracy and reflect how the subject is identified in recent sources. The question of a page move should be determined based on broader source usage and consensus, but the evidence presented is sufficient to justify adding the full name to the lead. ~2026-32922-33 (talk) 16:47, 2 June 2026 (UTC) (削除ここまで) Strike sock comment In solidarity, Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 19:09, 14 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
@Team meraseo: Stop making changes to the WP:COMMONNAME without WP:CONSENSUS to change this article name itself. I seriously doubt all these Temporary IDs that are supporting your stance are sock/meat puppets. And this is not a proper page move consensus either (see WP:RSPM). You have to involve other experienced users involved at WP:ICTF and elswhere. Pinging experienced editors @Ravensfire, RegentsPark, 19Arham, Shshshsh, Anupam, and Manick22:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Shahid • Talk2me 14:46, 7 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Oppose as per WP:COMMONNAME. Please stop making unnecessary changes and arguing with editors who are trying to uphold the standards of the article. 19Arham (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /