Talk:Berggruen Institute

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject icon United States Low‐importance

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject icon Organizations Low‐importance

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Vaniasciol (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. ([1])
Tomcohen05 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. ([2])
Jenny Bourne (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. ([3])

"an independent, non-partisan think tank"

This is factually wrong. They are partisan shills for US intelligence/related functions. On facebook I just read an article they buddied with Huffington shills themselvs titling the "Fall of Aleppo" when in fact it was liberated from the terrorists that were encouraged and supported by the US government politicians.

Someone needs to flag this organization inmediately as a fraud.Arutun (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Note that this editor has been blocked from editing at Wikipedia for "gross incivility": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Arutun --Pete Tillman (talk) 02:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Were the Europeans ever asked or informed if this organisation was going to meddle in Europe? If strengthening the European idea was one of their activities, they did not succeed, because Brexit happened. The size of the endowment would indicate they cover for something. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:9CDB:E026:ACCB:B19C (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

I believe you. An interesting link is Jeffrey Epstein and the woman (Katherine Keating) coming out of his house waiving off Prince Andrew. Acosta was told 'Epstein is intelligence, leave him alone'. Katherine Keating is former Australian PM Paul Keating's daughter. These people grow up with security and then get to know the foot soldiers who pave their way. Katherine Keating has never had a 'proper' job after working for Bob Carr when she was very young. Her activities which can be seen on y-tube and Huff-post do not look like being a crust. Who pays the Berggruen Inst, that she associates with, is not visible. She herself does not talk, nor does her father, why she was in Epstein's house and so friendly with Prince Andrew. What would she do? Rub shoulders with rich and famous and inform the 'services' where to extract money or which people think untoward thoughts? 2001:8003:AC99:3B00:1DE6:4D97:E539:D136 (talk) 07:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

21st Century Council: Kissinger

[edit ]

I can find no evidence Kissinger was ever on the board of the 21st Century Council. Deleted. See: [4] --Bill Huston ^(talk) 02:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Berggruen_Institute&oldid=1249468944"