Talk:Bellahouston
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography , a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
[Untitled]
[edit ]Have removed the phrase "newly built" from the description of the Palace of Art, because the Glasgow City Council - Bellahouston Page says the building is left over from the 1938 Empire Exhibition, and video evidence here seems to corroborate it. Insipid 22:54, 29 August 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
It's the "Palace of Arts Centre for Sports Excellence" that's newly built, but the rather unwieldy name might have led to confusion. I'll leave it be as the phrase dates the article unnecessarily. Stx 18:02, 20 September 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
- I see what you're saying and do agree (as you said, it dates the article); but based on that glasgow.gov.uk link (and seeing the building now and pictures then) I'm not convinced they're different buildings. It may house new "functionality", but I think it's the same structure. Insipid 00:05, 22 September 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
- Now that I've had a look into it, I'm fairly sure that my assumption was mistaken. The "newly built" phrase comes from an earlier edit by the article originator, and I had assumed it was an extension to the Palace of Arts from the Empire Exhibition as I've not lived in the area for a while. This doesn't seem to be the case at all on further investigation. Cheers! Stx 12:15, 22 September 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yeah, I see. I hated to sound so petty, but I really wanted my first not-totally-trivial Wikipedia edit to be on solid ground. :P Cheers! Insipid 18:13, 3 October 2005 (UTC) [reply ]