Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Bed Chem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bed Chem article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Bed Chem is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by N Ø at 18:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.


This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Pop music Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Songs
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
WikiProject icon Women in Music Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
A fact from Bed Chem appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bed Chem.
Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

[edit ]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

( Comment or view )
( Article history links: )
Converted from a redirect by MaranoFan (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 72 past nominations.

N Ø 14:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC).[reply ]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - The hook fact from ALT0 is mentioned only in the Bed Chem article, not in the Juno article.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @MaranoFan, nice work on these articles. I just had one comment about ALT0, which I mentioned above, but ALT1 is good to go if you want that to be approved instead. Epicgenius (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I added ALT0 to the other article too, Epicgenius. I like both hooks so frankly I have no preference.--N Ø 14:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)\[reply ]
Looks good to me. Epicgenius (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

About Genre:

[edit ]

I'm not certain that you can assert with confidence that "Bed Chem" is a disco song. The tempo and instrumentation are much more evocative of 90's/2000's styled R&B from artists like SWV, or Aaliyah, or TLC, and the beat doesn't have a four-on-the-floor styled accent, or a swing at all. Espresso is a great example of the elements that comprise Nu-disco music, or other songs of hers like "Read Your Mind", or "Feather", where there is a distinct four-on-the-floor drum beat, and a swing clearly present. There are lots of other modern examples of what I mean, here's a few: Dance the Night, Say So, About Damn Time, and After Midnight. I think "Bed Chem" is generally closer to synth-pop and Contemporary R&B, even the references on the wiki page acknowledge that Bed Chem is heavily R&B inspired, and I would say its more than just that. Let me know what you all think though. 130.15.33.190 (talk) 18:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

GA review

[edit ]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bed Chem/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 18:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Reviewer: Locust member (talk · contribs) 16:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]


This article looks like it is in beautiful shape so I'll be taking this on :) Will try to get this done by the weekend. Locust member (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable , as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images , where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Broad

  • Covers the major aspects of a standard song article and does not veer off topic. Green tickY

NPOV

  • Green tickY

Stable

  • No edit disputes within the past 14 days. Slight vandalism from an anonymous editor a few days ago but nothing that seems persistent. Green tickY

Illustrated

  • Images are correctly licensed and have ALT text. Green tickY
  • Sound sample is correctly licensed and relevant, complies with WP:SAMPLE. Green tickY

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /