Talk:Baby Shaker
Review : June 6, 2026. (Reviewed version ).
| WikiProject icon | Internet culture Low‐importance | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| WikiProject icon | Apps Low‐importance | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- Did you know... that the app Baby Shaker was removed from the App Store for letting players shake a baby to death?
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 03:33, 8 September 2025 (UTC) Reply
- ... that the app Baby Shaker was removed from the App Store for letting players shake a baby to death? Source: Hutcheon, Stephen (April 23, 2009). "Apple pulls baby shaking game". WAtoday .
- Reviewed:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:40, 3 August 2025 (UTC).Reply
- Page is new and long enough. QPQ is not required. WP:EARWIG finds no copyvio. Hook is interesting and sourced. Seems good to me! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 01:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC) Reply
(削除) * Comment: @ArtemisiaGentileschiFan: my bad, I accidentally overrode your edit there. I still habe the same concerns I addressed in my now-reverted edit: the source used doesn't follow the sentence with the fact. The Guardian source does, and should be used instead. Personally, I say . Roast (talk) 01:23, 3 August 2025 (UTC) (削除ここまで)Reply
- Another comment: my bad again, the source is actually cited and I wasn't looking correctly. Ignore previous comment. I'm a clusterfuck to this DYK nom here. Roast (talk) 01:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Guerreroast: Striking through the {{dyk? }} doesn't send it to Approved, so I'll do that now; apologies if I've misinterpreted.--Laun chba ller 13:47, 9 August 2025 (UTC) Reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Baby Shaker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: OpalYosutebito(talk · contribs) 19:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Reviewer: Tarlby(talk · contribs) 21:35, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable , as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
toby
[edit ]Jeez, this looks pretty interesting. Nice job on getting a DYK on this one. Expect me to begin soon! toby in solidarity 21:35, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Tarlby I'm currently live-streaming, but I'll be sure to address the issues tonight! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:30, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I just finished the lead and most of the copyediting in the description section. However, I'm not sure if rocking the baby as intended "kills" it, since the provided source doesn't say anything about the "good ending"... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:47, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Other than that, I'm pretty much done (as far as I know), and I'm awaiting further feedback! :D (Edit: please keep in mind that it's 11:15 pm in my area, so I might not respond immediately) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:15, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Alright, looks like some pretty simple fixes. Nice job! toby in solidarity 03:56, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Thanks! I just did more copyediting :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:09, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Alright, looks like some pretty simple fixes. Nice job! toby in solidarity 03:56, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Other than that, I'm pretty much done (as far as I know), and I'm awaiting further feedback! :D (Edit: please keep in mind that it's 11:15 pm in my area, so I might not respond immediately) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:15, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Lead
[edit ]- Baby Shaker is a controversial discontinued mobile game that was available on the Apple App Store for a short time in April 2009. -> Baby Shaker was a controversial mobile video game that was available on the Apple App Store for two days in April 2009. (Done)
- ...the game features a minigame in which... Unless that is how sources describe it, it sounds incorrect to call the game a "minigame" if the minigame is itself the whole game. (Done)
- Developed by Sikalosoft, the game features a minigame in which players can quiet an illustration of a baby accompanied by sounds of distress by either rocking their iPhone or shaking it, the latter of which results in the depicted baby's death. This is worded weirdly IMO and does not clearly state the goal of the game: Developed by Sikalosoft, the game tasks players with either rocking or shaking their IPhone for as long as possible to quiet a crying baby; by shaking it, the baby dies. (Done)
- The app received widespread negative attention across the Internet... It is better to say who or what people gave this game widespread negative attention. (Done)
Description
[edit ]- Baby Shaker solely consists of a minigame in which... Like the above, I'm not sure if "minigame" is the right word here. (Done)
- There are two ways players can calm the baby down: they can either rock their iPhone back and forth as if they are cradling a baby in their arms, or they can shake their iPhone, which... -> Players must calm the baby: they can rock their iPhone back and forth like they are cradling the baby, or shake it, which... (Done)
- Does rocking the baby also stop it from crying? Or is it just by killing it?
- ...protesters showed up outside of... -> ...protests occurred outside the... (Done)
(削除) In response to the criticism, (削除ここまで)Baby Shaker was removed from the App Store on April 23, 2009, two days after its release. (Done)- I see a useful amount of sources in the Further Reading section. Why not use them? (Done)
- I am now awaiting your responses.
Spotcheck
[edit ]Sourcing for this article seems pretty simple, so I will check less than I usually would for other reviews. The following refers to this revision.
(削除) 3 (削除ここまで)- Does not source the 2025 inflation stat.
- The app was removed on April 22, not 23 (it says the source was written on "Thu 23 April" and that it was removed Wednesday).
(削除) 4 (削除ここまで)Does not source the 2025 inflation stat.- 6
- 7
- 15
- 17
A few hits, so I'll check a couple more.
- 1
- 20
- 21
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- GA-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
- GA-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Apps
- GA-Class apps articles
- Low-importance apps articles
- WikiProject Apps articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles