Talk:AutoDock
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This software is a base of modern molecular modeling and deserve its description in wikipedia. It is also one of most cited docking software.
What changes would you suggest to article AutoDock do be sure that speedy deletion criteria could be lifted?Wojcz (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC) Reply
- Left a message on your talk page. Bejinhan Talk 13:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC) Reply
Hello, thank you for your help. I pasted <hangon> just below the warning banner. I wrote information about Autodock, basing on information from the wiki site of autodock and google searches, I wrote text without copypasting, the only copies were the names, links and the article titles.Wojcz (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC) Reply
It seems to me that the wording of this article needs improvement. This is nothing I could do very well since I'm not a native speaker. Maybe you can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eva kiszka (talk • contribs) 16:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AutoDock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100305073154/http://www.omixon.com/omixon/faces/prod_docking.jsp to http://www.omixon.com/omixon/faces/prod_docking.jsp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Reply