Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Aries (astrology)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aries (astrology) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1 Auto-archiving period: 30 days
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Astrology High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 26 June 2013 for a period of one week.

Aries facts for real

[edit ]

Aries don't really have a temper. I've never met one with a temper or anyone who knew an Aries with a temper. And their definitely top verse. Lucky color is red. There are 4 stars in the Aries constellation. Also very passionate. A fire sign too, along with Leo and Sagittarius. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxsxnflowerbbyx (talkcontribs)

Aries

[edit ]

what year was the Aries zodiac story made 2603:6000:.&checktime(9340,60,34,':')4D:E780:8CF5:EC30 (talk) 02:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Bias here...

[edit ]

I do NOT believe in astrology, but feel it is quite obvious that there SHOULD be some discussion of the general "characteristics" of the signs as held by Western astrology, if only to document the sociology of this phenomenon. Not including them feels like "Oh this is unscientific, we don't need to put that stuff in." There's explanations of all sorts of unscientific stuff on Wikipedia. The typologies DO have some common thread; that should be sussed out and included, if only in small part. Mercster (talk) 00:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /