Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Ann Dunham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ann Dunham article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3
Former good article Ann Dunham was one of the History good articles , but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 12, 2008 Articles for deletion Kept
September 3, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
September 23, 2025 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Biography : Politics and Government / Science and Academia
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon Hawaii Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Politics Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Women scientists Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Women's History Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Barack Obama (inactive)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama
WikiProject icon Women writers Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Notability

[edit ]

She's notable for being the mother of President Barack Obama, not as an anthropologist. The Lede should reflect this immediately in the 1st sentence. Also there are nude pics being circulated online claiming they are of her, and I wonder if the Article should address this directly, whether it's true or not, etc... Tym Whittier (talk) 18:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC) [reply ]

Tym Whittier. Thanks for the heads-up. She's mentioned as Obama's mother in the second sentence, and she was a good anthropologist, so I think the lede is ok as is. As for the purported nude pics, with photoshop scams these days, there's a lot of questionable photos. Having read the main bio book of her, I didn't have the sense that nude pics were her thing. And WP:BLP cautions us to be very reticent about that stuff. Bellagio99 (talk) 19:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC) [reply ]

The lady is dead and gone. She isn’t alive to defend herself. I believe the photos are her. But they don’t add anything and are only hurtful to her surviving family. F. L. (talk) 01:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

Stanley Dunham is listed as both a "she" and a "he". I do not know how to correct.

[edit ]

Stanley Dunham is listed as both a "she" and a "he". I do not know how to correct. 195.252.196.90 (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Where specifically are you seeing this? Her father's name was also Stanley. Cullen328 (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Article review

[edit ]

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements including entire paragraphs. There is also extensive use of block quotes (which may not follow WP:SS) and lots of short, one sentence paragraphs that should be merged. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 23:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

GA Reassessment

[edit ]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:18, 23 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Lots of short, one-sentence paragraphs added after its GAN promotion that need to be formatted more effectively. Extensive use of block quotes which do not adhere to a summary style and might have copyright concerns. Z1720 (talk) 04:03, 9 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Z1720: I haven't really been involved in this too much since the GAN, but I'm willing to take a look and see if there's anything I can do to help. Viriditas (talk) 21:08, 9 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
@Z1720: Making my way through 16 years of revisions isn't an easy task. Do you know if there's a way to use a WikiBlame-like tool that only shows me major deletions and additions? That's all I need to see really. Viriditas (talk) 21:42, 9 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
@Viriditas: I'm not aware of any such tool, other than comparing diffs. Z1720 (talk) 21:50, 9 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Oh, I just realized. The page statistics page basically does this in a compact form. I will start there. Viriditas (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
BTW, the page statistics tool does all of this and more. Very handy. Viriditas (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  • @Z1720: I'm looking through the article now and I see there are some minor issues with what newer sources have reported. I also don't like how the family life section is given precedence over her other achievements. If this was an article about a single father pursuing a career you can guarantee that the article wouldn't be structured this way. Viriditas (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  • @Viriditas: Is there information from sources about her other accomplishments that can be added? I am fine with de-emphasizing her family life in favour of giving more information to her accomplishments. I suspect this happened because she is Obama's mother, so many sources give information in relation to him. Z1720 (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    My overarching point is that the article needs a renewed effort at clarification and verification. I was browsing through Scott 2011, which I don't believe is used as a source since it was published years after the GAN. There's been a lot of new information and analysis since that time. For example, the opening line in the early life section says the subject was born at St. Francis Hospital, but this may not be true. It also doesn't mention anything about the Unitarian church they attended in Seattle. Lots of missing details like that. Further, the early life section skips over most of her formative years, which is detailed by Scott 2011. It then segues right into family life and marriages even though Scott 2011 makes it clear that this is not what Ann wanted or wanted to be define by, but I admit it is difficult to structure this otherwise. All I'm saying is that this GAR will need some extra time. My biggest concern is making sure there are no errors. Viriditas (talk) 23:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Viriditas: Thanks for the update and the clarification. If editors are willing to work on the article, this GAR will remain open. I went through the "Family life" section and removed off-topic or TMI information. Feel free to revert anything you felt should not have been removed. I fully support expanding the article, and feel free to ping me with questions or if this is ready for a re-review. Z1720 (talk) 23:07, 10 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Well, I just dived in. I had no idea this article had degraded to such an extent. Dunham's thesis is cited in four different types of citations and dozens of times from those four. It's like whoever was editing just didn't care and did whatever. This is going to take weeks to fix. Viriditas (talk) 02:09, 12 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Viriditas: Are you still interested in working on this article? Z1720 (talk) 14:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Z1720: I made 60 edits to address the problems. If you think more are needed, let me know where. Viriditas (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Viriditas: Ref 60 ("Gandhi, Vikram (December 16, 2016),") Should be replaced as it is an IMDB source. Upon a skim I don't see anything else that needs to be addressed. After this is resolved, is this article ready for a full review? Z1720 (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Probably not. You should just go ahead and fail it if you think it doesn't meet the criteria. It's been ten years and too many editors, and there's no way I can vouch for the article in its current state. Viriditas (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

No marriage certificate

[edit ]

This article on Ann Dunham says her parents "married on May 5, 1940". The reference 5 given is a mere assertion, not including a marriage certificate. I can't get one from Kansas, as I am not related to the parties. Two different places are given, Eldorado and Wichita, both in Kansas. I have seen it said that there is no marriage certificate for 5/5/1940 in Kansas. ~2025-37937-49 (talk) 12:12, 2 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /