Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Aluminium–lithium alloys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Chemistry Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Metalworking Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More info re: Airliners

[edit ]

The article currently states:
"They are currently used in a few commercial jetliner airframes".
I request that more info be provided here. Which jetliners are currently using Al-Li? Thanks, Lester 23:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

solubility limit

[edit ]

The article currently states:

  • Commercial Al-Li alloys contain up to 2.45% lithium...
  • This effect works up to the solubility limit of lithium in aluminium...

So, what is the solubility limit of lithium in aluminum? Is 2.45 % the solubility limit of lithium in aluminum? Geo Swan (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

Well, I don't know if 2.45 % the solubility limit of lithium in aluminum, but I must tell that when the limity of solubility is crossed,no alloy is make. In the botton, we we will have aluminum, while lithium will be up. Agre22 (talk) 21:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply ]
I also think that if there's too much lithium in aluminum, the alloy can become too weak. Anything too much is bad. Agre22 (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply ]

Lighter but bigger?

[edit ]

I'm surprised to see the Li atom is bigger than the Al atom. Al has more electrons and I'd expect a wider radius therefore. How does that work? Midgley (talk) 10:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

See the atomic radius article for a periodic table of radii and a good explanation. --IanOsgood (talk) 21:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Aplication as armor

[edit ]

Is any kind of Al-Li alloy used as an armor or to make a helmet?This site: [Key to metals] talks about this subject, but doesn't tells if Al-Li is being used ina commercial base.Agre22 (talk) 21:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply ]

Size of atoms ? lithium atom is larger than an aluminium one ?

[edit ]

the article says

"Strain hardening- The lithium atom is larger than an aluminium one"

really ? the lithium atom with 3 proton and 3 electrons on 2 shells is bigger than the aluminium atom with 13 protons and 13 electrons on 3 shells ? how is that even possible ? by redefining the definition of "largeness" for an atom ?

67.204.17.20 (talk) 10:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Quite right, I removed the offending statement. Wizard191 (talk) 20:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
Just FYI, the lithium atom is larger than the aluminum atom. See the atomic radius article IanOsgood linked to earler. 24.130.82.66 (talk) 18:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
so should we reinstate, but with some ref to justify ? (& see 2009 comment "Lighter but bigger" above) - Rod57 (talk) 09:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

Should note many have more copper than lithium by mass

[edit ]

Should note many (the 2000 series) have more copper than lithium by mass. Can we explain why they are called Al-Li alloys ? & Are they all less dense than pure Al as implied by intro ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /