Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Agential realism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 days ago by ~2026-42770-63 in topic Possible AI generated writing
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agential realism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources:Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WPrefs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Philosophy : Metaphysics Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
/
Taskforce icon
Metaphysics

Adding diffraction, agential realism's methodology

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems that agential realism's methodology of diffraction should be added to this page. I'll look again when I have time to work on this to see if someone else has added it. GoldenBearOne (talk) 06:12, 26 November 2025 (UTC) Reply

Possible AI generated writing

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 days ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

Concerns were raised previously via tag about AI-generated content in this article, which is prohibited per WP:NEWLLM. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just changing the superficial signs. Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:57, 23 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

The section in question, concerning criticism of Barad, cites only three sources for the criticisms. None of the sources in question actually cite Barad. Citing Haraway as a critic of Barad is especially suspicious because Haraway is a supporter of Barad's work (for example, in her book Modest_Winess@Second_Millenium, pp. 116-18). ~2026-42770-63 (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /