Talk:Ad Lib, Inc.

Creative Labs may well be unscrupulous, but the statement as written isn't backed up and doesn't sound very NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.108.238.3 (talk) 17:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC) Reply

A fair amount of musical creation programs, such as trackers, were created to utilize the AdLib. Would it be out of place to mention this? Perhaps in a separate paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.92.19.175 (talk) 11:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Reply

If I remember correctly, the AdLib was actually named Ad Lib. I'll check the old Ad( )Lib user manuals I have lying around at home... JAL 82.92.15.150 06:08, 24 August 2006 (UTC) Reply

Ok, checked (yeah, needed that 1.5 year :)), and it is indeed Ad Lib, with the space. I'll change the text on the page, but I have no idea how to change the actual page title. Jalwikip (talk) 09:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Reply

Ok, moved page to company name. Jalwikip (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Reply

Ad Lib went bankrupt mostly because they couldn't secure enough private investment in their R&D efforts. Even worse, the company had trouble with their R&D claim (the government was very slow processing claims at the time). They made several appeals to the provincial government for financial help. At the time, they were one of the very few high-tech companies in Quebec City, so they hoped that someone would care -- in vain. In the end, their product (the unfinished AdLib Gold specs and prototypes) was purchased by a German company, which released it almost immediatly (without proper debugging). Hugo Dufort 20:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Reply

Additional reference: Excerpt: "Before Ad Lib went bankrupt they had already sent prototypes of the Gold and development software to several software companies." -- Hugo Dufort 20:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Reply

It would be interesting to read what maneuvers, if it is known, Creative did to prevent Ad Lib from creating an alternative product. ex: At the time I heard that Yamaha did not fully cooperate or even slowed the development of the AdLib Gold card. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanph01 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC) Reply

There is no such thing as "University of Quebec". Either Prevel was teaching at Université Laval (in Quebec City) or he was teaching at an undisclosed campus of the Université du Québec network (province-wide). Somebody should correct the information. -- Hugo Dufort 07:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Reply

I think Dune was one of the half dozen games that came out supporting the Gold. I remember it on the setup screen, as an option. Timharwoodx 21:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC) Reply

I have classified this as a Start Class article because it is thorough, but entirely unreferenced. If references were added, it would likely be a B class. I have assessed this as low importance, because the article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Canada, but covers a topic directly related to Canada. Cheers, CP 23:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Reply

How about listing and linking a few of the major games with AdLib support? Of interest is "Duke Nukem II", the only game I know of that supports simultaneous use of Soundblaster and AdLib sound effects. (Of course this requires a soundcard that has AdLib support!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.100.251.134 (talk) 11:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Reply

The article doesn't mention anything about the price tag the soundcards had at their launch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.22.51.15 (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC) Reply

Computer gaming world mentions the price of the AdLib being 195ドル in the September issue of 1989, which is the earliest mention I could find in said magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.195.67 (talk) 15:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ad Lib, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore }} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots |deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140714185616/http://queststudios.com/smf/index.php?topic=2885.0;wap2 to http://queststudios.com/smf/index.php?topic=2885.0;wap2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140904211309/http://queststudios.com/quest/midi.html to http://www.queststudios.com/quest/midi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

[画像:check]Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Reply

In this article it is said, that the Ad Lib card was released in 1987. In books by Karen Collins (e.g. Game Sound, 2008) or in Mark J. P. Wolf's Encyclopedia of Video Games it is stated, that it was released one year early in 1986. Are there any reliable (first hand) sources, that can confirm a date? --Rettinghaus (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Reply

The first revision of the card PCB is dated 1987 through a datecode (mod. 870324) plus AdLib's own press releases point to an official product shipping date of June 1987. Bratgoul (talk) 05:12, 24 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Adlib. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 9#Adlib until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Reply