Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Acute inhalation injury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I added the NPOV tag because I think this is not just an article about Acute inhalation injury but also makes a political case. Please discuss. Biscuittin (talk) 14:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

What is the purpose of this disconnected info on one page, and who made it? Is it some sort of ad to start a national agency about acute inhalation in association with terrorism? It does not make sense.AtomAnt (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC) [reply ]

This is a very comprehensive enumeration of ALL of the possible causes of Acute Inhalation Injury, their effects, and possible treatments. Sure, simple household exposure and perhaps forest fires (in western US) are the most likely to cause ordinary exposure, but I commend the author for presenting information about all possible toxic inhalants and exposure environments for readers. I see a scientific, not political intent. BVinCA (talk) 18:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

In keeping with the scientific presentation of information I cleaned up the intro. To my knowledge the use of gases in a bioterrorism related event has not occurred yet so it is merely speculative and has been removed as well as the discussion of an urgent need to develop new techniques for respiratory assistance. To me this bit actually sounded like someone was trying to supplement a grant proposal by ensuring places other than their grant application also mentioned an urgent need for additional procedures. Methylated603 (talk) 16:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /