Talk:Actual malice
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law , an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Comments
[edit ]There appears to be a typo in this page. I believe that in the phrase "at the same time defining it in tems of the proof which had previously been usual", "tems" should be "terms". (For that matter, "which" should be "that": "at the same time defining it in terms of the proof that had previously been usual."
I am not a legal expert and therefore did not attempt to edit it.
- The typo was in my text -- i have corrected it. Thanks for spottign it. DES 23:36, 25 May 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
Added a bit of text clarifying that the standard applies to public figures as well as public officials. Qualified the "reckless disregard" standard. 158.104.174.136 (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]