Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Actias sinensis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Lepidoptera Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

[edit ]

editorial Action required: It appears that the photo of the male specimen used here is of Actias parasinensis. The distribution given is likely incorrect, as the range refers to A. sinensis prior to A. parasinensis being described in 2009. I don't have a copy of Brechlin 2012, which described further Actias species and should give better insight into the distribution situation. Good, correctly identified, photos of A. sinensis and A. parasinensis can be found on the Paukstadt collection webpages (boxes 3 & 5 at http://wildsilkmoth-indonesia.com/1act_vis.html) and also on the iBiol Lepidoptera Barcoding project at http://www.lepbarcoding.org/saturnidae/species.php?region=1&id=43344 The wikipages for A. sinensis and A. parasinensis should cross-reference to each other with a "similar species" text to point out the differences in morphology and distribution. HKmoths (talk) 12:11, 3 August 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /