Talk:Abstract rewriting system
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abstract rewriting system article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale. | |||||||||||||||
icon To-do list for Abstract rewriting system: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2009年08月13日
- discuss rewriting modulo an equivalence relation
Propose a merge of the abstract rewriting system subsection from rewriting into this article. That section, and this article, appear to be very nearly cut-n-paste's of one another, but also seem to be diverging in terms of quality of content, number of references, etc. Maintaining two copies of the same treatment just seems like a waste of resources (and makes the reading of thee two articles tedious, due to the repetition). linas (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]