Talk:Abrikosov vortex
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce .
Combine with Quantum vortex and Fluxon pages?
[edit ]Should these pages all be combined, since (as far as I know) they are all about the same thing? Biscuitknees (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
- Indeed, topically the section about Quantum Vortex in superconductors is the same as the Abrikosov vortex article.
- 1. However, we need for sure "Abrikosov vortex" page to be found as this is standard keyword that many students search for.
- 2. Also, the Abrikosov vortex page can be extended to discuss the vortices in thin films (Pearls Vortices) and I am not sure that one wants to insert such a big chunk of text into general Quantum Vortex article.
- 3. Following this line of thoughts, there are also quantized vortices in Josephson junctions (JJ). Should they be included into Quantum vortices article too? I think not as text but just as a reference. In addition, in JJ there are unquantized vortices such as semifluxons.
- I would limit the whole story by proper interlinking. Edward (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]