Talk:AMBER

The image actually used MM2 but I don't think there is a visible difference. Bensaccount 19:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Reply

I don't think the authors isn't necessary to be listed in wiki. Or at least, I think they should be listed on the Software section, not in the introduction. What do you think about that? Lý Minh Nhật (talk) 03:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Reply

Does the potential energy function of Amber Focefield have improper dihedral term? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.236.198.181 (talk) 14:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AMBER. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050829021414/http://amber.ch.ic.ac.uk:80/archive/ to http://amber.ch.ic.ac.uk/archive/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck }}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC) Reply

e.g. in the non-bonded terms f sub ij is not defined. I imagine it is a factor that is 0 for 1-3 bonded atoms, and possibly 0.5 for 1-4 interactions, and 1.0 for other atom-atom interactions.

rij 0 = (r i + r sub j) for two atoms interacting eij = sqrt( ei * ej ) for the two atoms interacting

1/4pie0 = 332.0637 kcal/mol-coulomb .&checktime(2601,47,47,':')7E:43C0:70F3:9D1D:3893:A567 (talk) 13:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC) Reply