Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:@earth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books . To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsVisual arts

Sources

[edit ]
Latest comment: 14 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

The problem with this article is not really that it reads like an advertisement - this is a by-product of the fact the article was (1) written by the co-author (2) uses mainly primary sources e.g. related to Kennard or the publishers (Tate). It's a difficult one as far as 'reliable' sources go, Kennard is an important anti-establishment artist that, as a result, gets picked up and reported by sources on the edges of 'respectable' media. However, there are one or two 'respectable' secondary sources out there and they need incorporating into the article before an unsympathetic WP editor passes by. Sionk (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Reply

And another thing...

[edit ]
Latest comment: 14 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

The book doesn't have a single word in it, it's a vehicle for Kennard's art. Should it really be part of WP Books?? Sionk (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on @earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck }}).

[画像:X mark]N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC) Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II

[edit ]
Latest comment: 2 years ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 12 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page . Student editor(s): Akashdeep Singh Brar (article contribs ). Peer reviewers: Sneha. .0529 .

— Assignment last updated by Sneha. .0529 (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC) Reply

'Abstract or Description

From a formal perspective, the size, price, and content of the book reflect and illustrate Kennard’s extensive research into making political imagery available to a general, non-specialist audience. Combining the global platform of the Web with digital photography and the political cartoon, @earth serves as an original contribution to the genre of the visual book whilst maintaining a readable narrative of fierce political content. Art critic John Berger writes: ‘Eschewing words, it [@ earth] insists on not being forgotten. He [Kennard] is a master of the medium of photomontage.[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akashdeep Singh Brar (talkcontribs) 16:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /