Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:2012 Crittenden tornado

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Lightbulb Noob in topic Sourcing question
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2026. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather , which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s

Sourcing question

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 2 comments2 people in discussion

@Lightbulb Noob Did I oversource the NWS summary of the damage too much? shane (talk to me if you want!) 18:26, 17 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

Oversourcing is usually over 3 citations in rapid succession. The tornado summary should be fine unless the NWS summary already describes all the given details, in which the other citations wouldn't be needed. Lightbulb Noob (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /