Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:2011 Italian referendums

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums , an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections , electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page .Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
WikiProject icon Italy Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Politics Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

[edit ]
Latest comment: 14 years ago 6 comments5 people in discussion

Should there be an explanation here of what the four questions are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ziosmithy (talkcontribs) 07:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

I agree, the 4 questions need to be listed, and maybe also explained. 78.134.84.245 (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

Also, is there a good reason for "ND" (No direction) rather than a dash (-) or a question mark (?) ? Because "ND" is too similar to "NO" in my opinion. Unless it's wikipedia policy to say "ND", those boxes should be replaced with question marks or dashes. 78.134.84.245 (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

Agree. I was confused for a minute or two bu the ND/NO similarity (especially as there are almost no NOs at all). Studying the legend sorted it out, but it is unclear. +1 for "-". Martinwguy (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

I'm only going by automatic translations of the sources, but it looks as though ND in some cases means the party encouraged people to vote, but didn't adopt an official position, and in other cases that they discouraged voting. I think it would be good if an Italian speaker could put this information into the table, given the importance of turnout in these referendums. 81.98.38.48 (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Reply
Being Italian, I can. I have the intention to work on the article in the near future. Angelikfire (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC) Reply
[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Italian referendums, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore }} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots |deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Italian referendums, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /