Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:2006 Cleveland Browns season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by JeffGBot in topic Dead link 26
Former good article 2006 Cleveland Browns season was one of the Sports and recreation good articles , but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
May 29, 2007 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon United States : Ohio Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Cleveland Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland , the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ .ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA

[edit ]
Latest comment: 19 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Article has passed some minor things would include References expansion and some trimming of the article otherwise its fine, cheers. Lakers 04:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Reply

Delisting

[edit ]
Latest comment: 19 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

I feel that this does not meet Good Article status. In general, most of the article is unsourced and point-of-view.

  1. Well written? The article isn't very well written and contains a lot of grammar errors.
  2. Factually accurate? This article is mostly original research and quotes such as "The play was not reviewed even after the Jets called a time-out for the booth official to think it over, and the Browns hung on to win," are misleading and inaccurate. This article contains no sources for game summaries. The first sections are well sourced.
  3. Thorough? This article goes into details about everything from the season, but maybe even too much detail.
  4. Non Point-of-View? This article has a very high POV from a Browns fan perspective. One of the sentences reads, "Unfortunately, the damage was already done. With the loss, Cleveland would fall to 2-6." The article contains many weasel words.
  5. Stable? No edit warring from a look at the history.
  6. Images? The article doesn't contain any images with the exception of the logo for the year.

If you have any questions, ask where appropriate.++aviper2k7++ 04:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

[edit ]
Latest comment: 15 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /