Talk:2/32nd Battalion (Australia)

G'day, I believe that the 2/32nd Battalion may have had three different Unit Colour Patches over the course of its existence. Firstly, a yellow and white upright rectangle in a grey border (similar to the First World War 32nd Battalion), then a purple over red circle, and then finally a purple inside red 'T' shape. I'm trying to find a ref for this, and some explanation for the first change (I know why it changed the second time after Tobruk). Does anyone have anything on this? I have found a couple of refs that talk around it, or don't quite explain it: . @Anotherclown, Nick-D, and Hawkeye7: Gents, are any of you able to help in this regard? Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Reply

Ok, I found something, but if anyone has a better ref than the Digger History site, I will replace it. Thanks. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2/32nd Battalion (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore }} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots |deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-badges/patches/2aif.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck }}).

[画像:check]Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2/32nd Battalion (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160309213301/http://army.gov.au/our-history/army-history-unit/chief-of-army-history-conference/previous-conference-proceedings/~/media/files/our%20history/aahu/conference%20papers%20and%20images/2003/2003-the_pacific_war_1943-1944_part_1.ashx to http://www.army.gov.au/Our-history/Army-History-Unit/Chief-of-Army-History-Conference/Previous-Conference-Proceedings/~/media/Files/Our%20history/AAHU/Conference%20Papers%20and%20Images/2003/2003-The_Pacific_War_1943-1944_Part_1.ashx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC) Reply