Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:1970 Idaho gubernatorial election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articles 1970 Idaho gubernatorial election has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review : November 12, 2019. (Reviewed version ).
A fact from 1970 Idaho gubernatorial election appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 January 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1970 Idaho gubernatorial election.
Wikipedia
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon United States : Idaho / Governors Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon Politics Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Elections and Referendums
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums , an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections , electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page .Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Sources to use

[edit ]

-- MoreExtra, 15:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

GA Review

[edit ]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1970 Idaho gubernatorial election/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Puddleglum2.0 (talk · contribs) 21:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]


Issues

[edit ]

@MoreExtra: Thank you for nominating this article for GA status! Below I will post some issues I find with the article; if you fix all of them, I will pass the nomination.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable .
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Please put in more citations, especially in the beginning after you write who won the election. @MoreExtra: I added some citation needed templates to show you which places I thought needed templates the most. Puddleglum2.0👌(talk) 22:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

@User:Puddleglum2.0 Thank you! I made the changes -- how's it look now? -MoreExtra (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

@MoreExtra: It looks good! I've passed it. Puddleglum2.0👌(talk) 15:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

@User:Puddleglum2.0 Thank you so much! I really appreciate your help. -MoreExtra (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
@MoreExtra: No problem. You did a really great job on this article, I'm glad it passed. :) Yours - Puddleglum2.0 Have a talk? 17:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

  • Comment: The hooks aren't direct quotes; however, I did my best to model the wording after the originals. Thank you for your time!

Improved to Good Article status by MoreExtra (talk). Self-nominated at 17:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC).[reply ]

  • Good work! New enough (as a recent Good Article), long enough, QPQ not needed, within policy, Earwig finds no copyvios. Hook facts check out (ALT1 on AGF), but each needs a wikilink to the main article in boldface. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antony-22 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
Original hook and ALT1, with the former being preferred. Antony–22 (talk ⁄contribs ) 22:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /