Talk:1955 Scottsbluff tornado
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Narutolovehinata5 in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather , which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject , an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month .History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 00:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Scottsbluff, Nebraska"}">The 1955 Scottsbluff tornado near Scottsbluff, Nebraska
The 1955 Scottsbluff tornado near Scottsbluff, Nebraska
- ... that over ninety photographs and several videos were taken of the 1955 Scottsbluff tornado (pictured), which produced cycloidal marks ?
- ALT1: ... that the 1955 Scottsbluff tornado (pictured) was the most well-documented tornado in history at the time of the event, including aerial photos of cycloidal marks the tornado produced? Source: https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/40/3/1520-0477-40_3_109.xml
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hayseed Stephens, Template:Did you know nominations/NGC 1700
- Comment: Feel free to suggest another hook. If Cycloidal marks isn't long enough, I'll expand it.
E F 5 17:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC).Reply
- The article isn't too bad but "well-photographed" is not a perfect analogue for "well-documented" in both the source and the article. While it might be relatively moot it still seems a little too SYNTH-y. The cycloical marks article really isn't long enough (at all) for DYK. It could be expanded, or you could change the hook to focus just on the Scottsbluff tornado.
- Hmm, I also think the claim about being the "best-documented" and indeed all figures for photographs focus on the tornado family - the AMS source you linked is even titled Notes on Scottsbluff, Nebraska, Tornadoes, 27 June 1955 - are we sure the article is even on one single tornado? This is about the most clean-up work I'm comfortable not failing; it's not quite "insurmountable" and I do think it's possible. Let me know when you're done clarifying everything and I'll finish my review. Departure– (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Departure–: Will do shortly. How about that the 1955 Scottsbluff tornado (pictured) produced "unusual markings" later determined to be cycloidal marks? Debolding cycloidal marks gets rid of the length issue, as nonbolded links in the hook don't have quality standards. Will do the rest shortly once I finish up Draft:1920 Hackleburg–Phil Campbell tornado (which is surprisingly a real event). E F 5 21:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @EF5: Have the above concerns been resolved, and is this ready for a re-review? Z1720 (talk) 02:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Withdrawn - Don't have the time, unfotunately. E F 5 00:06, 19 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Departure–: Will do shortly. How about that the 1955 Scottsbluff tornado (pictured) produced "unusual markings" later determined to be cycloidal marks? Debolding cycloidal marks gets rid of the length issue, as nonbolded links in the hook don't have quality standards. Will do the rest shortly once I finish up Draft:1920 Hackleburg–Phil Campbell tornado (which is surprisingly a real event). E F 5 21:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC) Reply
Categories:
- B-Class Weather articles
- Mid-importance Weather articles
- B-Class Thunderstorm and tornado articles
- Mid-importance Thunderstorm and tornado articles
- WikiProject Severe weather articles
- WikiProject Weather articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- B-Class Nebraska articles
- Unknown-importance Nebraska articles
- WikiProject Nebraska articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class history of science articles
- Low-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles