Talk:1314–1316 conclave
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1314–1316 conclave article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Add new text under old text.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roman Curia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct .Roman CuriaWikipedia:WikiProject Roman CuriaTemplate:WikiProject Roman CuriaRoman Curia
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
.svg){kind=link}
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums , an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections , electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page .Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
| Former good article nominee | 1314–1316 conclave was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| Did You Know | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 15, 2008 . The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the protracted papal conclave, 1314–1316 , the first of the Avignon Papacy, was mediated by three incumbent and future French monarchs in succession? | |||||||||
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Papal conclave, 1314–1316/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The lead is not all-inclusive; the lead is supposed to summarize the article, not introduce it (the lead should be sufficient to understand the topic and its outcome without reading the rest). The outcome is not mentioned in the summary. Otherwise the article is well written, with good prose and in line with the Manual of Style.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable .
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The list of electors is not sourced, neither is the last paragraph of the "aftermath" section.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images , where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- User "upright" syntax with portrait (tall) images.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- The article is on hold until the issues mentioned are resolved. Arsenikk (talk) 14:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Reply
- After two and a half weeks the issues have not been seen to, so I am forced to fail the article as good. A shame, since there was so little to, and unfortunately I do not have the knowledge to fix them all. Arsenikk (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Reply
- The article is on hold until the issues mentioned are resolved. Arsenikk (talk) 14:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Reply
- Pass/Fail:
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2025 papal conclave which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:15, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Reply
Categories:
- C-Class European Microstates articles
- Unknown-importance European Microstates articles
- C-Class Vatican City articles
- High-importance Vatican City articles
- Vatican City articles
- WikiProject European Microstates articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Former good article nominees
- Wikipedia Did you know articles