Talk:*SCAPE building
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Arconning in topic GA review
Good articles *SCAPE building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review : May 26, 2025. (Reviewed version ).
Review : May 26, 2025. (Reviewed version ).
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:*SCAPE building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: ZKang123(talk · contribs) 08:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
Reviewer: Arconning(talk · contribs) 13:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Shall review! Arconning (talk) 13:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @ZKang123 Here shall be my comments. Arconning (talk) 06:55, 22 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @ZKang123 Pinging again for some further comments.:) Arconning (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Prose and MoS
[edit ]Lead and infobox
[edit ]- The source within the infobox for the firm could be removed as I see it's cited in the body?
- I rather keep it there for now.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 13:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
- No other things I can find...
Site
[edit ]- "The Youth Park ", is this another term for *SCAPE? This could be clarified better if so!
- Actually a different place just opposite *SCAPE
Architecture
[edit ]- "This site was left undeveloped because an MRT line runs beneath it.", could the line be specified?
- The source didn't say so, but from the maps it's also clear. I can wikilink to North South line.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 13:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Construction
[edit ]- Wikilink "Orchard Cineleisure" to Cathay Cineleisure Orchard.
- Done.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 13:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
- "a hub for young entrepreneurs.", this still kind of baffles me, could this have some more clarification?
- Not so sure what it means either.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 13:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Subsequent revamps
[edit ]- No issues.
Media
[edit ]- Image used has a proper license and is relevant to the article with a proper caption. All good.
- If another image could be inserted that'd be quite nice!
Refs
[edit ]- Ref check: 2, 4, 11, 19, 25. All good.
Misc
[edit ]- No ongoing edit war, broad enough information, neutral enough.
Subsequent comments
[edit ]- "Some tenants shared that they were experiencing significant financial losses and had requested rent reductions.", does the source state who some of the tenants were? An example could be given to give more context for the reader.
- "Many retailers had turned to offering discounts to sustain their businesses.", same here.
- @Arconning: Clarified the above. Also I hope you don't mind, but are you able to chime in at a discussion on an ongoing FAC nomination? Thanks--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 11:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Shall see what I can do.:) Arconning (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.