Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:+972 Magazine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Day Creature in topic Reception Edit Request 26 August 2025
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Israel Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon Websites : Computing Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites , an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon Magazines Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}} You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{
display:none;
}
Stop: Parts of this page are restricted

Parts of this article are related to the Arab–Israeli conflict , which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction .

You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)


Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict .

The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:

  • All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion, excepting citations and quotations.
  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page, except for making constructive edit requests.
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances).

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

If it is unclear which parts of the page are covered, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

Untitled

[edit ]
Latest comment: 14 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
  • Can somebody pls do a redirect from 972mag and 972mag.com? Thanks
Done. InverseHypercube (talk) 21:36, 22 April 2012 (UTC) Reply

Magazine?

[edit ]
Latest comment: 11 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Although +972 self-describes as a "magazine", I have removed the link to online magazine since the lede of that article states: "can usually be distinguished by its approach to editorial control. Magazines typically have editors or editorial boards who review submissions and perform a quality control function to ensure that all material meets the expectations of the publishers (those investing time or money in its production) and the readership." and this is precisely what +972 does not do, at least according to this published description of its editorial process and its own website: "a platform for our bloggers to share analysis, reports, ideas, images and videos on their channels. Each blogger owns his or her channel and has full rights over its contents (unless otherwise stated). The bloggers alone are responsible for the content posted on their channels; the positions expressed on individual blogs reflect those of their authors, and not +972 as a whole."

I am also removing categories that categorize it as a magazine.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Reply
[edit ]
Latest comment: 9 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on +972 Magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Reply

Change Lead

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

I think the Lead should be a paraphrase and summary, rather than including a quote by a co-founder. Let others describe it.Parkwells (talk) 23:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Reply

SYNTH

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 years ago 3 comments2 people in discussion

The recent addition violates SYNTH as no source makes any statement about the writers collectively. Beyond that it wouldnt belong in the lead section regardless. nableezy - 06:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Reply

Additionally there is no source for the claim it is "radical left". nableezy - 06:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Reply

Removing all claims that the magazine is "far left" or "radical left". I think they would not dispute claims to be "left-wing". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.141.188 (talk) 12:32, 21 September 2018 (UTC) Reply

Editing references

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Currently both Reference 1 is "Leibovitz, Liel (19 January 2012). "Wake-up Call". Tablet." and Reference 6 "Liel Leibovitz (19 January 2012). "Wake-Up Call: The leftist Israeli magazine +972 wants to sound the alarm on a Jewish state it believes is destroying itself". Tablet." refer to the identical article. Perhaps they should be merged, the latter's wording being used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcljlm (talkcontribs) 11:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC) Reply

Edit summary

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

In the summary of my 10:32 edit I wrote "Added Liel to "According to Leibovitz"". Noticing the phrase appeared twice I attempted to change that to "Added Liel to the first appearance of "According to Leibovitz"", delete it via "undo" and write a new edit summary but have been unable to do any of them. What should I have done? Mcljlm (talk) 11:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC) Reply

What updating does the reception part need

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

I don’t think it needs updating Gahex220 (talk) 10:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Reply

Reception Edit Request 26 August 2025

[edit ]
Latest comment: 11 months ago 2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: Adding info about the magazine being recognized for an award by Harvard's journalism institution.

Diff:

Some of these supporters, such as [[Gershom Gorenberg]], also expressed skepticism that +972 primarily reports human rights abuses committed by Israelis but not Palestinians, but were \"reluctant to criticize the site or its writers\" despite these reservations. \n\nThe same year, the Israeli right-wing [[NGO Monitor]] accused ''+972'' of being [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]] for applying the [[Israel and apartheid|apartheid analogy]] regarding Israel's treatment of Palestinians.{{cite news |first=Benjamin |last=Weinthal |date=25 January 2012 |title=NGO Monitor slams funding of '+972' blog |newspaper=[[The Jerusalem Post]] |url=https://www.jpost.com/International/NGO-Monitor-slams-funding-of-972-blog |access-date=5 June 2017 |archive-date=22 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222001407/http://www.jpost.com/International/NGO-Monitor-slams-funding-of-972-blog |url-status=live }} \n\nIn response, Sheizaf said: \"The attack on ''+972'' is being carried out in the standard way NGO Monitor, [[Im Tirtzu|Im Tirzu]] and similar organizations work these days: Not by debating the content of our reports and commentary pieces, but by trying to delegitimize and silence us.\"{{cite web |first=Noam |last=Sheizaf |date=26 January 2012 |url=https://972mag.com/right-wing-group-jerusalem-post-launch-public-attack-on-972-magazine/33914/ |title=Right-wing group, Jerusalem Post launch public attack on +972 |publisher=+972 |access-date=5 June 2017 |archive-date=8 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708061205/https://972mag.com/right-wing-group-jerusalem-post-launch-public-attack-on-972-magazine/33914/ |url-status=live }} In February 2012, Sheizaf said \"[[American Jews|Jewish American]] liberals are not on our side. [Most Americans] will only support my liberalism to a certain degree. When I fight for the right of an Arab woman to become a doctor, you will stand by and donate to the [[New Israel Fund]]. But if I say '[[Jerusalem]] is an apartheid city,' which it is—Jerusalem is the worst place in the world in terms of citizenship laws—American liberals get goosebumps.\""},"2":{"wt":"==Reception==\nIn 2012, according to ''The Nation'', writers for the left-wing newspaper ''[[Haaretz]]'' and left-wing Israeli intellectuals believed that the new web magazine fills an important gap in Israeli media reporting, primarily focusing on settlements and human rights abuses against Palestinians. Some of these supporters, such as [[Gershom Gorenberg]], also expressed skepticism that +972 primarily reports human rights abuses committed by Israelis but not Palestinians, but were \"reluctant to criticize the site or its writers\" despite these reservations. \n\nThe same year, the Israeli right-wing [[NGO Monitor]] accused ''+972'' of being [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]] for applying the [[Israel and apartheid|apartheid analogy]] regarding Israel's treatment of Palestinians.{{cite news |first=Benjamin |last=Weinthal |date=25 January 2012 |title=NGO Monitor slams funding of '+972' blog |newspaper=[[The Jerusalem Post]] |url=https://www.jpost.com/International/NGO-Monitor-slams-funding-of-972-blog |access-date=5 June 2017 |archive-date=22 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222001407/http://www.jpost.com/International/NGO-Monitor-slams-funding-of-972-blog |url-status=live }} \n\nIn response, Sheizaf said: \"The attack on ''+972'' is being carried out in the standard way NGO Monitor, [[Im Tirtzu|Im Tirzu]] and similar organizations work these days: Not by debating the content of our reports and commentary pieces, but by trying to delegitimize and silence us.\"{{cite web |first=Noam |last=Sheizaf |date=26 January 2012 |url=https://972mag.com/right-wing-group-jerusalem-post-launch-public-attack-on-972-magazine/33914/ |title=Right-wing group, Jerusalem Post launch public attack on +972 |publisher=+972 |access-date=5 June 2017 |archive-date=8 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708061205/https://972mag.com/right-wing-group-jerusalem-post-launch-public-attack-on-972-magazine/33914/ |url-status=live }} In February 2012, Sheizaf said \"[[American Jews|Jewish American]] liberals are not on our side. [Most Americans] will only support my liberalism to a certain degree. When I fight for the right of an Arab woman to become a doctor, you will stand by and donate to the [[New Israel Fund]]. But if I say '[[Jerusalem]] is an apartheid city,' which it is—Jerusalem is the worst place in the world in terms of citizenship laws—American liberals get goosebumps.\"\n\nIn 2025, the [[Nieman Foundation for Journalism]] awarded ''+972'' the Louis M. Lyons Award for Conscience and Integrity in Journalism, celebrating the magazine's integrity to facts despite danger and adversity.{{Cite web |date=2 April 2025 |title=Nieman Fellows Honor +972 Magazine with Lyons Award for Conscience and Integrity in Journalism |url=https://nieman.harvard.edu/nieman-fellows-honor-972-magazine-with-lyons-award-for-conscience-and-integrity-in-journalism/ |access-date=26 August 2025 |website=[[Nieman Foundation for Journalism|Nieman Foundation]]}}"}},"i":0}}]}">
==Reception==In 2012, according to ''The Nation'', writers for the left-wing newspaper ''[[Haaretz]]'' and left-wing Israeli intellectuals believed that the new web magazine fills an important gap in Israeli media reporting, primarily focusing on settlements and human rights abuses against Palestinians. Some of these supporters, such as [[Gershom Gorenberg]], also expressed skepticism that +972 primarily reports human rights abuses committed by Israelis but not Palestinians, but were "reluctant to criticize the site or its writers" despite these reservations. The same year, the Israeli right-wing [[NGO Monitor]] accused ''+972'' of being [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]] for applying the [[Israel and apartheid|apartheid analogy]] regarding Israel's treatment of Palestinians. In response, Sheizaf said: "The attack on ''+972'' is being carried out in the standard way NGO Monitor, [[Im Tirtzu|Im Tirzu]] and similar organizations work these days: Not by debating the content of our reports and commentary pieces, but by trying to delegitimize and silence us." In February 2012, Sheizaf said "[[American Jews|Jewish American]] liberals are not on our side. [Most Americans] will only support my liberalism to a certain degree. When I fight for the right of an Arab woman to become a doctor, you will stand by and donate to the [[New Israel Fund]]. But if I say '[[Jerusalem]] is an apartheid city,' which it is—Jerusalem is the worst place in the world in terms of citizenship laws—American liberals get goosebumps."
+
==Reception==In 2012, according to ''The Nation'', writers for the left-wing newspaper ''[[Haaretz]]'' and left-wing Israeli intellectuals believed that the new web magazine fills an important gap in Israeli media reporting, primarily focusing on settlements and human rights abuses against Palestinians. Some of these supporters, such as [[Gershom Gorenberg]], also expressed skepticism that +972 primarily reports human rights abuses committed by Israelis but not Palestinians, but were "reluctant to criticize the site or its writers" despite these reservations. The same year, the Israeli right-wing [[NGO Monitor]] accused ''+972'' of being [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]] for applying the [[Israel and apartheid|apartheid analogy]] regarding Israel's treatment of Palestinians. In response, Sheizaf said: "The attack on ''+972'' is being carried out in the standard way NGO Monitor, [[Im Tirtzu|Im Tirzu]] and similar organizations work these days: Not by debating the content of our reports and commentary pieces, but by trying to delegitimize and silence us." In February 2012, Sheizaf said "[[American Jews|Jewish American]] liberals are not on our side. [Most Americans] will only support my liberalism to a certain degree. When I fight for the right of an Arab woman to become a doctor, you will stand by and donate to the [[New Israel Fund]]. But if I say '[[Jerusalem]] is an apartheid city,' which it is—Jerusalem is the worst place in the world in terms of citizenship laws—American liberals get goosebumps."(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) In (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) 2025, (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) the (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) [[Nieman (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) Foundation (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) for (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) Journalism]] (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) awarded (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) ''+972'' (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) the (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) Louis (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) M (追記ここまで)(追記) . (追記ここまで)(追記) Lyons (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) Award (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) for (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) Conscience (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) and (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) Integrity (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) in (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) Journalism, (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) celebrating (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) the (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) magazine's (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) integrity (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) to (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) facts (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) despite (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) danger (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) and (追記ここまで)(追記) (追記ここまで)(追記) adversity (追記ここまで)(追記) . (追記ここまで)

I EAT PINBALLS (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Reply

Done Day Creature (talk) 00:35, 27 August 2025 (UTC) Reply

References

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /