Proceratosaurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proceratosaurus Temporal range: Bathonian, 166 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N ↓
Partial skull
Holotype skull (NHMUK PV R 4860)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Clade:	Dinosauria
Clade:	Saurischia
Clade:	Theropoda
Family:	†Proceratosauridae
Genus:	†Proceratosaurus von Huene, 1926
Species:	†P. bradleyi
Binomial name
†Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910 [originally Megalosaurus])
Synonyms
Megalosaurus bradleyi Woodward, 1910

Proceratosaurus /proʊ̯sɛrətoʊˈsɔːrəs/ (from Greek πρό/πρότερος pro/protero 'before', κέρας/κέρατος keras/keratos 'horn' and σαῦρος sauros 'lizard') is a genus of carnivorous theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) of England. It contains a single species. P. bradleyi, known from a mostly complete skull and lower jaws. Proceratosaurus was a small dinosaur, estimated to measure around 3 m (9.8 ft) in length.^{[1] [2] [3]} Its name refers to how it was originally thought to be an ancestor of Ceratosaurus , due to the partially preserved portion of the crest of Proceratosaurus superficially resembling the small crest of Ceratosaurus.^[4] Now, however, it is considered a coelurosaur, specifically a member of the family Proceratosauridae, and amongst the earliest known members of the clade Tyrannosauroidea.^[5]

The type specimen is held in the Natural History Museum in London and was described in 1910 from oolitic limestone of the Great Oolite Group near Minchinhampton while excavating for a reservoir.^[6]

In 1910, the British paleontologist Arthur Smith Woodward reported a partial theropod skull discovered some time prior by F. Lewis Bradley during excavation for a reservoir at Minchinhampton, a town in the Cotswolds in Gloucestershire, England. Bradley had prepared the skull so that the left side was exposed, and submitted it to the Geological Society of London. Woodward made the skull the holotype specimen of a new species of Megalosaurus (a genus named in 1824), M. bradleyi, in honour of its discoverer. At the time it was discovered, it was one of the most complete theropod skulls known from Europe, possibly with the exception of the crushed and hard to interpret skulls of Compsognathus and Archaeopteryx . Currently the skull is housed at the Natural History Museum, where it is catalogued as specimen NHMUK PV R 4860. The upper part of the skull missing due to a fissure that had eroded the rock and was partially filled with calcite.^{[7] [1]}

In 1923, the German palaeontologist Friedrich von Huene moved the species to the new genus Proceratosaurus, assuming it was the ancestor of the Jurassic genus Ceratosaurus , but since the name was only used in a schematic, the name has been considered a nomen nudum , an invalidly published name. He validated the name three years later in two 1926 articles by providing a diagnosis of the genus. While remaining one of the best preserved theropod skulls in Europe, and globally one of the best preserved Middle Jurassic theropod skulls, it since received little scientific attention, mainly being mentioned in studies about general aspects of theropod anatomy and evolution. The holotype skull was since CT scanned at the University of Texas, further mechanically prepared to reveal additional details of the skull, jaw, and teeth, and was re-described by the German palaeontologist Oliver W. M. Rauhut and colleagues in 2010.^{[1] [8]}

Proceratosaurus was a small dinosaur. In restudy at 2010, total length of 2.98–3.16 m (9.8–10.4 ft) and body mass of 28–36 kg (62–79 lb) are estimated.^[1] Various books estimated it to measure 3–4 m (9.8–13.1 ft) in length and 50–100 kg (110–220 lb) in body mass.^{[2] [3]}

Arthur Smith Woodward, who initially studied Proceratosaurus, placed it as a species of Megalosaurus , due to same number of premaxillary teeth (4).^[7] Later study during the 1930s by Friedrich von Huene suggested a closer relationship with Ceratosaurus , and Huene thought both dinosaurs represented members of the group Coelurosauria.^[9]

It was not until the late 1980s, after Ceratosaurus had been shown to be a much more primitive theropod and not a coelurosaur, that the classification of Proceratosaurus was again re-examined. Gregory S. Paul suggested that it was a close relative of Ornitholestes , again mainly due to the crest on the nose (though the idea that Ornitholestes bore a nasal crest was later disproved). Paul considered both Proceratosaurus and Ornitholestes to be neither ceratosaurs nor coelurosaurs, but instead primitive allosauroids. Furthermore, Paul considered the much larger dinosaur Piveteausaurus to be the same genus as Proceratosaurus, making Piveteausaurus a junior synonym.^[10] However, no overlapping bones between the two had yet been exposed from the rock around their fossils, and future study showed that they were indeed distinct.^[1]

Several phylogenetic studies in the early 21st century finally found Proceratosaurus (as well as Ornitholestes) to be a coelurosaur, only distantly related to the ceratosaurids and allosauroids, though one opinion published in 2000 considered Proceratosaurus a ceratosaurid without presenting supporting evidence. Phylogenetic analyses by Thomas R. Holtz Jr. in 2004 also placed Proceratosaurus among the coelurosaurs, though with only weak support, and again found an (also weakly supported) close relationship with Ornitholestes.^[1]

The first major re-evaluation of Proceratosaurus and its relationships was published in 2010 by Oliver Rauhut and colleagues. Their study concluded that Proceratosaurus was in fact a coelurosaur, and moreover a tyrannosauroid, a member of the lineage leading to the giant tyrannosaurs of the Late Cretaceous. Furthermore, they found that Proceratosaurus was most closely related to the Chinese tyrannosauroid Guanlong . They named the clade containing these two dinosaurs the Proceratosauridae, defined as all theropods closer to Proceratosaurus than to Tyrannosaurus, Allosaurus , Compsognathus , Coelurus , Ornithomimus , or Deinonychus .^{[1] [11]}

Below is a cladogram from a 2022 study by Darren Naish and Andrea Cau on the genus Eotyrannus :^[12]

Reconstruction of Proceratosaurus bradleyi, with almost all of its dorsal half missing. Missing elements reconstructed after Guanlong wucaii