The portion of the commercial that elicited widespread media and popular attention
The commercial starts by showing a woman applying HeadOn on her forehead[ 1] against a monochromatic background.[ 6] The tagline "HeadOn: Apply directly to the forehead" is stated three times in a loud, monotone voice[ 1] [ 7] while a large yellow arrow points at her forehead.[ 4] The commercial then cuts to an image of the product's packaging[ 4] and either states, "HeadOn is available without a prescription at retailers nationwide"[ 1] or "available at Walgreens "[ 6] without describing the product or its purpose.[ 1]
Responses to the commercial were largely negative, with The Today Show listing it as the worst commercial of 2006.[ 8] Seth Stevenson of Slate noted the advertisement's "blunt force" and described it as "mesmerizing in its cheesiness".[ 4] Kate Wagner of The Baffler compared the actress' expression to a "military commander on a Maoist poster" and described the commercial as both "bizarre" and "unsettling."[ 1] Wagner further said the commercial was "unlike anything humans would reasonably produce to sell something."[ 1] Dan Neil , writing in the Los Angeles Times , similarly described the commercial as unique for its lack of information and compared it to North Korean propaganda .[ 5] Both The Today Show and Ad Age described the commercial as "obnoxious,"[ 9] [ 8] and multiple reviewers joked that the commercial gave viewers headaches.[ 5] [ 4] [ 9]
The Tonight Show with Jay Leno , Saturday Night Live , and The Daily Show With Jon Stewart parodied the commercial.[ 9] The 2008 spoof film Disaster Movie included a parody of the commercial,[ 10] and other parodies were shared on the online video-sharing platform YouTube .[ 11] Sales for HeadOn dramatically increased after the advertising campaign, doubling sales year-on-year from 2005 to 2006.[ 9] The commercial has been described as a highly effective marketing campaign, though it is unclear if Miralus Healthcare ever turned a profit.[ 12] : 1248
Herein lies the genius of HeadOn, a product that promises nothing, builds no expectations, disappoints no one. It's the Hillary Clinton of over-the-counter meds.
Yale marketing professor Dina Mayzlin argued that the commercial's crudeness and repetitiveness made it an especially effective advertisement.[ 2] Writing for the Cardozo Law Review , Jeremy Sheff theorized that the ad's repetition was effective because of the tendency for consumers to perceive familiar brands as more beneficial and less risky.[ 12] : 1278–1280 Ad Age also suggested that the commercial's camp -like style made it the target of free airtime and parody.[ 9] Wagner theorized that the unintentional nature of the commercial's absurdist humor made it one of the first and most effective instances of a brand employing absurdist advertising tactics.[ 1] Both Wagner and Stevenson suggested that the brand's relatively unknown status improved the effectiveness of the ad.[ 1] [ 4] In a piece on the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act , The Atlantic described the commercial as a notorious example of a commercial using loudness as an advertising tactic.[ 7]
HeadOn was distributed by Miralus Healthcare[ 2] in an applicator similar to a glue stick [ 12] : 1247 and sold at five and eight dollars.[ 12] : 1249 While Iris versicolor , white bryony , and potassium dichromate have been listed as its active ingredients ,[ 13] [ 14] the ingredients are in such small dilutions that the product consists almost entirely of wax .[ 13] [ 15]
HeadOn claims to relieve headaches using homeopathy ,[ 14] a pseudoscientific system of alternative medicine based on diluting active ingredients .[ 13] [ 16] No clinical trial has shown that HeadOn or any of its active ingredients relieve headaches.[ 14] [ 17] While Miralus claims that the product has been studied, no relevant data has ever been released to the public.[ 17] Medical experts have widely stated that any perceived headache relief from the product results from the placebo effect .[ 12] : 1248
The dilution technique employed by the product leaves only trace amounts of its active ingredients,[ 17] [ 12] : 1247 and no scientific evidence suggests that dilutions are effective in releasing the medicinal properties of any ingredients.[ 16]
Miralus also launched ActivOn in 2006, a similar homeopathic product for arthritis pain,[ 6] [ 9] RenewIn, a homeopathic brand of energy pills, and PreferOn, a homeopathic scar treatment cream.[ 12] : 1248
^ a b c d e f g h i Wagner, Kate (May 29, 2019). "Apply Directly to the Forehead: Lamenting the death of the truly weird TV ad" . The Baffler . Archived from the original on August 3, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ a b c d e Howard, Theresa (July 31, 2006). "Headache commercial hits parody circuit, well, HeadOn" . USA Today . Money, pp. 1b. Archived from the original on August 4, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023 – via EBSCOHost .
^ a b Dakss, Brian (August 2, 2006). "Doctor: 'Head On' No Headache Cure" . CBS News . Archived from the original on June 10, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2020 .
^ a b c d e f Stevenson, Seth (July 24, 2006). "Head Case: The mesmerizing ad for headache gel" . Slate . Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ a b c Neil, Dan (July 23, 2006). "Ad Nauseam" . Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on August 3, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ a b c d Unger, Brian (July 10, 2006). "Taking an Annoying Pain Commercial Head On" . Day to Day . NPR . Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ a b Garber, Megan (December 13, 2012). "Rejoice! The End of Ads That Yell at You" . The Atlantic . Archived from the original on August 3, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ a b Cooper, Gael Fashingbauer (August 22, 2006). "Best and worst commercials of the year" . Today . Archived from the original on October 6, 2021. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ a b c d e f Frazier, Mya (September 24, 2007). "This Ad Will Give You a Headache, but It Sells" . Ad Age . Archived from the original on August 3, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ Adie, Sarah (October 24, 2022). "What Can Be Learned By The Worst Medicine Advert?" . Voicentric . Archived from the original on August 21, 2023. Retrieved December 20, 2022 .
^ "Headache remedy becomes pop culture phenom" . United Press International . July 31, 2006. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ a b c d e f g Sheff, Jeremy N. (September 22, 2010). "Biasing Brands" . Cardozo Law Review . 32 . Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law : 1245– 1314. SSRN 1681187 . Archived from the original on August 4, 2023. Retrieved August 4, 2023 .
^ a b c Randi, James (July 28, 2006). "Head On Into Quackery" . Swift (Newsletter). Archived from the original on August 22, 2006. Retrieved July 28, 2006 .
^ a b c Redfearn, Suz (September 26, 2006). "Head Rub" . The Washington Post . Archived from the original on March 5, 2016. Retrieved August 3, 2023 .
^ Salas, Randy A.; Ward, Bill (February 7, 2008). "Hooey or True-y?" . Star Tribune . Archived from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023 .
^ a b Grimes, David Robert (2012). "Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible". Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies . 17 (3): 149– 155. doi :10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x .
^ a b c "Headache drug lacks evidence" . Consumer Reports . September 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2007. Retrieved January 23, 2008 .