Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Tattwamayananda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 14:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Swami Tattwamayananda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

WP:BEFORE shows no coverage in reliable, independent sources. Fails GNG. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Spirituality, and California. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete per WP:TNT and WP:BLP. The formatting makes no sense to me, nor even the title. The sourcing is far below what we expect from a biographical article of a person living in North America. Bearian (talk) 12:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Hello Bearian,

  I’ve gone ahead and made the necessary changes as discussed. I’ve worked to address the concerns, and I hope everything aligns with your expectations now. Please take a look and let me know if any further adjustments are needed!

  Please appove it.

  Thanks,

  Shashi. Shashi Boinapalli (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  I have revised the article to improve neutrality and structure. Swami Tattwamayananda is a senior monk of the Ramakrishna Order and head of the Vedanta Society of Northern California, a key institution in the spread of Hindu philosophy in the West. He has authored books, delivered international lectures, and contributed to Hindu philosophy and interfaith dialogue. I am working on adding more independent sources to establish notability, and I believe the article meets Wikipedia’s General Notability Guidelines (GNG) and should be retained. Prakhyatsingh (talk) 04:05, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello Jeraxmoira,

I’ve gone ahead and made the necessary changes as discussed. I’ve worked to address the concerns, and I hope everything aligns with your expectations now. Please take a look and let me know if any further adjustments are needed!

Please approve it.

Thanks,

Shashi. Shashi Boinapalli (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: With an unbolded Keep opinion here, this can't be closed as Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

• Notified: Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete. There are zero sources in the article. I searched for sources and found no reliable, secondary, independent sources covering the subject, only primary and unreliable sources. Woodroar (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.