User talk:95.152.219.67
October 2023
[edit ]Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Uzhhorod, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
January 2024
[edit ]Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Vydubychi Monastery. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 09:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zbruch Idol, you may be blocked from editing. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Black Klobuks. Mellk (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
February 2024
[edit ]Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ruthenian language, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mellk (talk) 23:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Valentyna Radzymovska. Mellk (talk) 01:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
April 2024
[edit ]Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ukraine–Vietnam relations. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 10:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [reply ]