Talk:Inferential role semantics
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Article merged: See old talk-page here —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrideOfKripkenstein (talk • contribs) 04:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
comment
I don't think the linked paper by Ned Block is a defense of CRS, in fact quite the opposite. The paper should be reviewed to ensure he is actually a proponent of the position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.30.189.33 (talk • contribs)
- It is difficult to tell because the paper lacks a complete bibliography. However, if we assume that when Ned Block is referring to himself when he uses the name "Block", then the first paragraph would seem to be a dead giveaway. In any case, the linked article has not been framed in any way at all in this stub, which makes the inquiry moot { Ben S. Nelson } 03:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
Categories:
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class philosophy of language articles
- Low-importance philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- Stub-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles