My problem is that my bootloader is not jumping to the application, or maybe it is but then jumps back to the bootloader because of an interrupt. To give you something to work with here are some info:
The code that jumps to the application
typedef void (*pFunction)(void);
pFunction Jump_To_Firmware;
void JumpToInternalFlashImage()
{
Jump_To_Firmware = (pFunction) (*(uint32_t *)(0x08008000 + 4));
__set_MSP(*(uint32_t*) 0x08008000);
Jump_To_Firmware();
}
How main looks in the application
int main(void)
{
// Copy ISRs to RAM
memcpy((uint8_t *)&_isr_vector_ram_start, (uint8_t *)&_isr_vector_flash_start, &_isr_vector_flash_end - &_isr_vector_flash_start);
// Relocate the vector table
SCB->VTOR = (uint32_t) &_isr_vector_ram_start;
HAL_Init();
SystemClock_Config();
MX_GPIO_Init();
MX_DMA_Init();
MX_USART2_UART_Init();
while (1)
{
HAL_UART_Transmit_DMA(&huart2, "hello", 5);
uint32_t i =0;
for(;i<1000000;i++);
}
It should perhaps be pointed out that this program works fine if I program it through ST link without any bootloader code. Also the important parts of this code should be the first lines where I copy the ISRs to RAM and then relocate the vector
The linkerscript looks like the following to give you an idea of where the addresses come from ( it looks the same in both bootloader and application )
/* Entry Point */
ENTRY(Reset_Handler)
/* Highest address of the user mode stack */
_estack = 0x20050000; /* end of SRAM2 */
/* Generate a link error if heap and stack don't fit into RAM */
_Min_Heap_Size = 0; /* required amount of heap */
_Min_Stack_Size = 0x400; /* required amount of stack */
// There are more areas but these should be the only relevant ones
MEMORY
{
FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x08000000, LENGTH = 1024K
RAM_ISR (xrw) : ORIGIN = 0x20000000, LENGTH = 512
RAM (xrw) : ORIGIN = 0x20000200, LENGTH = 64K - 512
}
SECTIONS
{
/* The startup code goes first into FLASH */
.isr_vector :
{
. = ALIGN(4);
_isr_vector_flash_start = .;
KEEP(*(.isr_vector)) /* Startup code */
_isr_vector_flash_end = .;
. = ALIGN(4);
} >FLASH
._isr_vector_ram (NOLOAD) :
{
. = ALIGN(4);
_isr_vector_ram_start = .;
KEEP(*(._isr_vector_ram)) /* Startup code */
. = ALIGN(4);
}>RAM_ISR
}
So my problem is that when I try to jump to the application it doesn't work
The first addresses from 0x8008000 ( application start address ) looks like
And at the address 0x08004DD1 it looks like
What happens is that I always end up stuck when the program counter points at(it does not move from this address when trying to step further )
0x8007770
and MSP
0x2004ffe0
in the output.map for the bootloader I can see that 0x08007770 is
.text.Default_Handler
0x08007770 0x2 startup/startup_stm32f746xx.o
0x08007770 RTC_Alarm_IRQHandler
0x08007770 EXTI2_IRQHandler
0x08007770 TIM8_CC_IRQHandler
0x08007770 DebugMon_Handler
0x08007770 UART8_IRQHandler
0x08007770 SPI4_IRQHandler
0x08007770 TIM1_CC_IRQHandler
0x08007770 DMA2_Stream5_IRQHandler
0x08007770 HardFault_Handler
and so on (the rest of the handlers )
Does anyone know what my problem is and how to solve it ? Please feel free to ask questions if you feel like I've missed to tell you something
1 Answer 1
You should adjust your linker scripts to reflect the fact that the programs are to be loaded to separate flash areas. So, for the bootloader you need
FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x08000000, LENGTH = 32K
and for the application:
FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x08008000, LENGTH = 992K /* (992 = 1024 - 32 */
-
\$\begingroup\$ Thanks, this actually changed things. It doesn't work yet but what happens what I do this is that the address that in the pictures is 0x08004DD1 changes to 0x0800CDCD and when I go to that address it's empty. Meaning that there's no data from that address. Any ideas of what causes that ? When programming I'm simply using a start address and then incrementing with 4 bytes until the entire bin file is programmed \$\endgroup\$user3660570– user36605702017年01月12日 09:40:12 +00:00Commented Jan 12, 2017 at 9:40
-
\$\begingroup\$ If the address is empty, then something is wrong with the flashing process, or the bin file got truncated, I'd first debug that issue. Also note that the actual instruction address is one less than the pointer value. \$\endgroup\$followed Monica to Codidact– followed Monica to Codidact2017年01月12日 12:11:33 +00:00Commented Jan 12, 2017 at 12:11
-
\$\begingroup\$ The thing is that my solution to copy the ISR vector memcpy((uint8_t *)&_isr_vector_ram_start, (uint8_t *)&_isr_vector_flash_start, &_isr_vector_flash_end - &_isr_vector_flash_start); is based of the start -and endaddress of flash. Is this really happening after I changed the memoryarea ? \$\endgroup\$user3660570– user36605702017年01月12日 12:29:01 +00:00Commented Jan 12, 2017 at 12:29
-
1\$\begingroup\$ I've noticed that if I program the app through ST-Link and choose startaddress 0x08008000 it works and no code seams to be missing at the address I pointed out earlier. But I am unsure of where the problem might be. Because all the data from the bin file seams to be in the flash when I use the bootloader, yet it is clear that data is missing on the memory addresses. Do you know if ST-Link does anything special other than just copying the BIN file to flash ? \$\endgroup\$user3660570– user36605702017年01月12日 15:08:49 +00:00Commented Jan 12, 2017 at 15:08
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Solved the issue. It was indeed the flashprogramming that failed because of overflowing buffers. The linkerscript could be either 0x08008000 or 0x08000000 but I'll mark this as the correct answer anyway \$\endgroup\$user3660570– user36605702017年01月13日 13:29:47 +00:00Commented Jan 13, 2017 at 13:29
Explore related questions
See similar questions with these tags.
i
be declaredvolatile
to avoid the loop being removed by the compiler's optimiser? \$\endgroup\$