Package: grep;
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 60257 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox
bug-grep <at> gnu.org:bug#60257; Package grep.
(2022年12月22日 16:35:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.Thomas Wolff <towo <at> towo.net>:bug-grep <at> gnu.org.
(2022年12月22日 16:35:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: Thomas Wolff <towo <at> towo.net> To: bug-grep <at> gnu.org Subject: please fix warnings from egrep and fgrep Date: 2022年12月22日 16:16:36 +0100
These tools spill out warnings that are irritating almost everyone, moreover, they are threatening to be removed. There was some discussion about this earlier this year, but with no consolidated outcome, so I'd like to raise the issue again. Some weird and wrong arguments were presented; first, many GNU tools do have POSIX extensions, including grep. Second and particularly: > egrep and fgrep were not entirely portable even before POSIX > deprecated them in 2001 grep -E and grep -F were not portable either! There are legacy systems which had egrep and fgrep but did not have grep options -E and -F. So all this achieves is really to annoy thousands of people and to waste time of hundreds of package maintainers. Please have mercy with the community. Give us the comfort of not being bothered when using egrep and fgrep in the future, and if it is as a Christmas present. Thanks Thomas
bug-grep <at> gnu.org:bug#60257; Package grep.
(2022年12月22日 19:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs <at> gmail.com> To: bug-grep <at> gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#60257: please fix warnings from egrep and fgrep Date: 2022年12月22日 13:35:19 -0600
On 12/22/22 09:16, Thomas Wolff wrote: > These tools spill out warnings that are irritating almost everyone, moreover, they > are threatening to be removed. > There was some discussion about this earlier this year, but with no consolidated > outcome, so I'd like to raise the issue again. > Some weird and wrong arguments were presented; first, many GNU tools do have POSIX > extensions, including grep. > Second and particularly: >> egrep and fgrep were not entirely portable even before POSIX deprecated them in 2001 > grep -E and grep -F were not portable either! There are legacy systems which had > egrep and fgrep but did not have grep options -E and -F. > So all this achieves is really to annoy thousands of people and to waste time of > hundreds of package maintainers. > Please have mercy with the community. Give us the comfort of not being bothered when > using egrep and fgrep in the future, and if it is as a Christmas present. > Thanks > Thomas If building from source, workaround with: sed -i "s/echo/#echo/" src/egrep.sh before configure. If not use: sed -i "s/echo/#echo/" /usr/bin/[ef]grep -- Bruce Dubbs linuxfromscratch.org
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(2023年10月17日 04:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(2023年10月17日 04:24:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.