Is there a way to use named parameters when getting the output parameters of a stored proc? Currently my knowledge of output parameters is very limited. It looks like I have to use them in order of their decleration in the stored proc. I.E if i did exec test @rich output,@bob output
the call would blow up. How can i have the order be arbitary? Thank you
create procedure test
@ID as INT output
,@mark as char(20) output
as
select @ID = 5,@mark='test'
go
declare @bob as int
declare @rich as char(20)
exec test @bob output, @rich output
select @bob,@rich
2 Answers 2
There is nothing special about OUTPUT parameters when it comes to "named parameters" or "ordinal parameters". In SQL Server this terminology this applies to the EXEC call and how you specify parameters there: not direction
- Ordinal = position must match and datatype must be compatible
- Named = assign the local value to the stored proc parameter name. Only datatype must be compatible
This is ordinal
declare @bob as int, @rich as char(20)
--OK
exec test @bob output, @rich output
GO
declare @bob as int, @rich as char(20)
--Fail
exec test @rich output, @bob output
This is named
declare @bob as int, @rich as char(20)
--OK
exec test
@ID = @bob output,
@mark = @rich output
GO
declare @bob as int, @rich as char(20)
--OK
exec test
@mark = @rich output,
@ID = @bob output
If you had a stored proc with parameters with defaults ...
create procedure test2
@ID as INT output
,@filler1 tinyint = 0 --has default
,@mark as char(20) output
,@filler2 tinyint = 0 --has default
as
select @ID = 5,@mark='test'
go
.. then you need the DEFAULT keyword for ordinal parameters if you have subsequent mandatory parameters
exec test2 @bob output, DEFAULT, @rich output --don't need to do anything for @filler2
For named parameters, it can be DEFAULT keyword or ignored because order is irrelevant
exec test2
@ID = @bob output,
@mark = @rich output,
@filler2 = DEFAULT
exec test2
@mark = @rich output,
@ID = @bob output
And the obligatory MSDN link
-
1What is different between the two exec statements in the 'This is ordinal' example?fordareh– fordareh2011年12月27日 23:05:12 +00:00Commented Dec 27, 2011 at 23:05
Quoting the relevant portion of the TSQL reference from MSDN (about 2/3 of the way down the page): Emphasis mine
First, create the procedure:
USE pubs
GO
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sysobjects
WHERE name = 'titles_sum' AND type = 'P')
DROP PROCEDURE titles_sum
GO
USE pubs
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE titles_sum @TITLE varchar(40) = '%', @SUM money OUTPUT
AS
SELECT 'Title Name' = title
FROM titles
WHERE title LIKE @TITLE
SELECT @SUM = SUM(price)
FROM titles
WHERE title LIKE @TITLE
GO
Next, use the OUTPUT parameter with control-of-flow language.
Note The OUTPUT variable must be defined during the table creation as well as during use of the variable.
The parameter name and variable name do not have to match; however, the data type and parameter positioning must match (unless @SUM = variable is used).
DECLARE @TOTALCOST money
EXECUTE titles_sum 'The%', @TOTALCOST OUTPUT
IF @TOTALCOST < 200
BEGIN
PRINT ' '
PRINT 'All of these titles can be purchased for less than 200ドル.'
END
ELSE
SELECT 'The total cost of these titles is $'
+ RTRIM(CAST(@TOTALCOST AS varchar(20)))
Here is the result set:
Title Name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Busy Executive's Database Guide
The Gourmet Microwave
The Psychology of Computer Cooking
(3 row(s) affected)
Warning, null value eliminated from aggregate.
All of these titles can be purchased for less than 200ドル.