[フレーム] Skip to main content
Javascript disabled? Like other modern websites, the IETF Datatracker relies on Javascript. Please enable Javascript for full functionality.

Independent Submission Editor Model
RFC 8730

This RFC was published on the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) stream. This RFC is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the IETF standards process.
Document Type RFC - Informational (February 2020)
Updated by RFC 9280, RFC 9920
Obsoletes RFC 6548
Was draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc6548bis (individual)
Authors N. Brownlee , R. Hinden
Last updated 2026年05月20日
RFC stream Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
Formats
Email authors IPR References Referenced by Get editor source Search Lists
RFC 8730

Internet Architecture Board (IAB) N. Brownlee, Ed.
Request for Comments: 8730 The University of Auckland
Obsoletes: 6548 R. Hinden, Ed.
Category: Informational Check Point Software
ISSN: 2070-1721 February 2020
 Independent Submission Editor Model
Abstract
 This document describes the function and responsibilities of the RFC
 Independent Submission Editor (ISE). The Independent Submission
 stream is one of the stream producers that create draft RFCs, with
 the ISE as its stream approver. The ISE is overall responsible for
 activities within the Independent Submission stream, working with
 draft editors and reviewers, and interacts with the RFC Production
 Center and Publisher, and the RFC Series Editor (RSE). The ISE is
 appointed by the IAB, and also interacts with the IETF Administration
 Limited Liability Company (LLC).
 This version obsoletes RFC 6548 to replace all references to the
 Internet Administrative Support Activity (IASA) and related
 structures with those defined by the IASA 2.0 structure.
Status of This Memo
 This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
 published for informational purposes.
 This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
 and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to
 provide for permanent record. It represents the consensus of the
 Internet Architecture Board (IAB). Documents approved for
 publication by the IAB are not candidates for any level of Internet
 Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.
 Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8730.
Copyright Notice
 Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors. All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document. Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document.
Table of Contents
 1. Introduction
 2. Independent Submission Editor
 2.1. Qualifications
 2.2. Responsibilities
 3. Independent Submission Editorial Board
 4. Security Considerations
 5. References
 5.1. Normative References
 5.2. Informative References
 IAB Members at the Time of Approval
 Acknowledgements
 Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
 The RFC Editor Model [RFC8728] defines a set of streams that produce
 draft RFCs, which are submitted for publication. This document
 defines the management function for the Independent Submission
 stream, specifically the role of Independent Submission Editor (ISE).
 The previous version of this document [RFC6548] is a derivative of
 [RFC5620], Section 3.2, and was separated out from [RFC6635].
 This document updates the Independent Submission Editor Model to
 align it with the IASA 2.0 structure [RFC8711] that creates the IETF
 Administration Limited Liability Company ("LLC") managed by a board
 of directors ("LLC Board"). This document obsoletes [RFC6548].
2. Independent Submission Editor
 The ISE is an individual who is responsible for the Independent
 Submission stream of RFCs, as defined by [RFC8729]. The Independent
 Submission stream and the ISE are not under the authority or
 direction of the RSE or the RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC)
 (see [RFC8728]). As noted below, the ISE is appointed by and is
 responsible directly to the IAB.
2.1. Qualifications
 The ISE is a senior position for which the following qualifications
 are desired:
 1. Technical competence, i.e., broad technical experience and
 perspective across a wide range of Internet technologies and
 applications, and also the ability to work effectively with
 portions of that spectrum in which they have no personal
 expertise.
 2. Thorough familiarity with the RFC series.
 3. An ability to define and constitute advisory and document review
 arrangements. If those arrangements include an Editorial Board
 similar to the current one or some equivalent arrangement, the
 ability to assess the technical competence of potential Editorial
 Board members (see Section 3).
 4. Good standing in the technical community, in and beyond the IETF.
 5. Demonstrated editorial skills, good command of the English
 language, and demonstrated history of being able to work
 effectively with technical documents and materials created by
 others.
 6. The ability to work effectively in a multi-actor environment with
 divided authority and responsibility similar to that described in
 [RFC6635].
2.2. Responsibilities
 The ISE is an individual who may have assistants and who is
 responsible for:
 1. Maintaining technical quality of the Independent Submission
 stream.
 2. Reviewing, approving, and processing Independent Submissions.
 3. Forwarding draft RFCs in the Independent Submission stream to the
 RFC Production Center.
 4. Defining and developing the scope of the Independent Submission
 stream as a part of the overall RFC Editor function [RFC6635].
 5. Reviewing and approving RFC errata for Independent Submissions.
 6. Coordinating work and conforming to general RFC Series policies
 as specified by the IAB and RSE.
 7. Providing statistics and documentation as requested by the RSE
 and/or LLC.
 The ISE may choose to select individuals to participate in an
 Advisory Board for assistance in special topics as the ISE deems
 appropriate. Such an Advisory Board exists at the pleasure of the
 ISE, and its members serve at the pleasure of the ISE.
 The individual with the listed qualifications is selected by the IAB
 after input has been collected from the community.
 While the ISE itself is considered a volunteer function, the IAB
 considers maintaining the Independent Submission stream part of the
 IAB's supported activities. Therefore, the LLC should include these
 costs in the IASA budget.
3. Independent Submission Editorial Board
 The ISE is supported by an Editorial Board for the review of
 Independent Submission stream documents. This board is known as the
 Independent Submission Editorial Board. This volunteer Editorial
 Board exists at the pleasure of the ISE, and its members serve at the
 pleasure of the ISE. The existence of this board is simply noted
 within this model, and additional discussion of such is considered
 out of scope of this document.
4. Security Considerations
 This document has no specific security implications, however the same
 security considerations as those in [RFC4846] and [RFC8729] apply.
5. References
5.1. Normative References
 [RFC4846] Klensin, J., Ed. and D. Thaler, Ed., "Independent
 Submissions to the RFC Editor", RFC 4846,
 DOI 10.17487/RFC4846, July 2007,
 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4846>.
 [RFC6548] Brownlee, N., Ed. and IAB, "Independent Submission Editor
 Model", RFC 6548, DOI 10.17487/RFC6548, June 2012,
 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6548>.
 [RFC8711] Haberman, B., Hall, J., and J. Livingood, "Structure of
 the IETF Administrative Support Activity, Version 2.0",
 BCP 101, RFC 8711, DOI 10.17487/RFC8711, February 2020,
 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8711>.
 [RFC8728] Kolkman, O., Ed., Halpern, J., Ed., and R. Hinden, Ed.,
 "RFC Editor Model (Version 2)", RFC 8728,
 DOI 10.17487/RFC8728, February 2020,
 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8728>.
 [RFC8729] Housley, R., Ed. and L. Daigle, Ed., "The RFC Series and
 RFC Editor", RFC 8729, DOI 10.17487/RFC8729, February
 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8729>.
5.2. Informative References
 [RFC5620] Kolkman, O., Ed. and IAB, "RFC Editor Model (Version 1)",
 RFC 5620, DOI 10.17487/RFC5620, August 2009,
 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5620>.
 [RFC6635] Kolkman, O., Ed., Halpern, J., Ed., and IAB, "RFC Editor
 Model (Version 2)", RFC 6635, DOI 10.17487/RFC6635, June
 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6635>.
IAB Members at the Time of Approval
 The IAB members at the time of approval of [RFC6548] were: Bernard
 Aboba, Ross Callon, Alissa Cooper, Joel Halpern, Spencer Dawkins,
 Russ Housley, David Kessens, Olaf Kolkman, Danny McPherson, Jon
 Peterson, Andrei Robachevsky, Dave Thaler, and Hannes Tschofenig.
 The IAB members at the time of approval of this document (RFC 8730)
 were: Jari Arkko, Alissa Cooper, Stephen Farrell, Wes Hardaker, Ted
 Hardie, Christian Huitema, Zhenbin Li, Erik Nordmark, Mark
 Nottingham, Melinda Shore, Jeff Tantsura, Martin Thomson, and Brian
 Trammell.
Acknowledgements
 Generous thanks to Joel Halpern for all his help with this document,
 and for all his work on [RFC6635]. Thanks also to the IAB members,
 whose comments and suggestions were both welcome and useful.
 Bob Hinden served as document editor for this RFC to align it with
 the IASA 2.0 structure.
Authors' Addresses
 Nevil Brownlee (editor)
 The University of Auckland
 Email: n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz
 Robert M. Hinden (editor)
 Check Point Software
 959 Skyway Road
 San Carlos, CA 94070
 United States of America
 Email: bob.hinden@gmail.com

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /