draft-ietf-dnsind-ixfr-00

[フレーム]

INTERNET DRAFT M. Ohta
draft-ietf-dnsind-ixfr-00.txt Tokyo Institute of Technology
 November 1994
 Expires in six months
 Incremental Transfer in DNS
Status of this Memo
 This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
 documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
 and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
 working documents as Internet-Drafts.
 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
 months. Internet-Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by
 other documents at any time. It is not appropriate to use Internet-
 Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a
 ``working draft'' or ``work in progress.''
 To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
 1id-abstracts.txt listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
 Directories on ds.internic.net, nic.nordu.net, ftp.nisc.sri.com, or
 munnari.oz.au.
Abstract
 This memo proposes extensions to the DNS protocols to provide an
 incremental zone transfer (IXFR) procedure.
1. Introduction
 For the quick propagation of changes to the DNS database, it is
 necessary to shorten the latency by actively notifying the change,
 which is accomplished by NOTIFY extension of DNS [NOTIFY].
 At the same time, to propagate a small amount of changes in a large
 zone, existing zone transfer mechanism to transfer all the data of
 the zone is quite inefficient and time consuming.
 Incremental transfer (IXFR) is a zone transfer mechanism to transfer
 only the changed portion of the zone,
 In this memo, a secondary name server who request IXFR is called IXFR
 client and a primary or secondary name server who responses the
 request is called IXFR server.
2. Brief Description of the Protocol.
M. Ohta Expires on May 25, 1995 [Page 1]

INTERNET DRAFT Incremental Transfer in DNS November 1994
 An IXFR client keeps record of older version of a zone. If the IXFR
 client think it needs updated information of the zone (typically
 through SOA refresh or NOTIFY mechanism), it sends an IXFR message
 along with the SOA serial number information of the older zone. If
 the client receives "Not implemented" response, it should try AXFR.
 An IXFR server should keep record of the newest version of the zone
 and the differences to several older versions. If IXFR request with
 memorized older version number is received, the IXFR server MAY send
 only the difference to that version. Otherwise, the entire zone is
 transferred just as normal zone transfer.
 All communication is done through TCP channel.
 Query type value of IXFR is <to be assigned by IANA>.
3. Query Format
 The IXFR query packet format is same as that of the normal DNS query
 with query type of IXFR, except that the authority section is non-
 empty and contains a single SOA record containing the version number
 of the older zone information.
4. Response Format
 If the incremental zone transfer is not available, the same message
 as AXFR (except that the query type is IXFR) is returned.
 If the incremental zone transfer is available, several pairs of
 messages with RCODE = IRESPONSE <value to be assigned by IANA> will
 be returned. Each message is, as usual with TCP transport, prefixed
 by two byte length fields. To indicate the end of transfer, two
 bytes of 0 is attached after the last message.
 Messages are always paired. Within the pair, the answer section of
 the former message contains information on removed RRs form the
 previous version and the latter message on added RRs. Modification of
 RR is performed first by removing the orginal and then adding the
 modified one. In the authority section, each message contains SOA of
 the version of the modified result
 Thus, the pairs give the history of changes made from the version
 IXFR client had up to the newest version.
 RRs in the incremental transfer messages may be partial. That is, if
 a single RR of multiple RRs of a node changes, only the information
 on changed RR needs to be transferred.
M. Ohta Expires on May 25, 1995 [Page 2]

INTERNET DRAFT Incremental Transfer in DNS November 1994
 By an IXFR client, the messages should be processed sequentially and
 replaced with the older version atomically only after all the
 messages are successfully processed.
5. Purging Strategy
 The IXFR server can not hold information on older versions forever.
 Information on older versions should be purged, if total length of
 IXFR messages is longer than that of an AXFR message. Considering
 that the purpose of IXFR is to reduce AXFR overhead, this is strategy
 is quite reasonable. It also assures that the amount of storage is
 at most twice as large as that of the current zone information.
 Information older than SOA expire period may also be purged.
 6. Example
 With the following three generations of data with the up-to-date
 serial number of 3,
 JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA NS.JAIN.AD.JP. mohta.jain.ad.jp. (
 1 600 600 3600000 604800)
 IN NS NS.JAIN.AD.JP.
 NS.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.1
 NEZU.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.1
 NEZU.JAIN.AD.JP. is removed and JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. is added.
 jain.ad.jp. IN SOA ns.jain.ad.jp. mohta.jain.ad.jp. (
 2 600 600 3600000 604800)
 IN NS NS.JAIN.AD.JP.
 NS.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.1
 JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.5
 IN A 192.41.197.2
 One of the IP addresses of JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. is changed.
 JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA ns.jain.ad.jp. mohta.jain.ad.jp. (
 3 600 600 3600000 604800)
 IN NS NS.JAIN.AD.JP.
 NS.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.1
 JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.3
 IN A 192.41.197.2
 The following IXFR query
 +---------------------------------------------------+
M. Ohta Expires on May 25, 1995 [Page 3]

INTERNET DRAFT Incremental Transfer in DNS November 1994
 Header | OPCODE=SQUERY |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Question | QNAME=JAIN.AD.JP., QCLASS=IN, QTYPE=IXFR |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Answer | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Authority | JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA serial=1 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Additional | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 will be replied with the following message:
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Header | OPCODE=SQUERY, RESPONSE |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Question | QNAME=JAIN.AD.JP., QCLASS=IN, QTYPE=IXFR |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Answer | JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA serial=3 |
 | JAIN.AD.JP. IN NS NS.JAIN.AD.JP. |
 | NEZU.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.1 |
 | JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.3 |
 | JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 192.41.197.2 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Authority | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Additional | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 or with the following four messages:
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Header | OPCODE=SQUERY, RESPONSE, RCODE=IRESPONSE |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Question | QNAME=JAIN.AD.JP., QCLASS=IN, QTYPE=IXFR |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Answer | NEZU.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.1 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Authority | JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA serial=2 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Additional | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Header | OPCODE=SQUERY, RESPONSE, RCODE=IRESPONSE |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Question | QNAME=JAIN.AD.JP., QCLASS=IN, QTYPE=IXFR |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
M. Ohta Expires on May 25, 1995 [Page 4]

INTERNET DRAFT Incremental Transfer in DNS November 1994
 Answer | JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.5 |
 | JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 192.41.197.2 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Authority | JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA serial=2 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Additional | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Header | OPCODE=SQUERY, RESPONSE, RCODE=IRESPONSE |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Question | QNAME=JAIN.AD.JP., QCLASS=IN, QTYPE=IXFR |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Answer | JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.5 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Authority | JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA serial=3 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Additional | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Header | OPCODE=SQUERY, RESPONSE, RCODE=IRESPONSE |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Question | QNAME=JAIN.AD.JP., QCLASS=IN, QTYPE=IXFR |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Answer | JAIN-BB.JAIN.AD.JP. IN A 133.69.136.3 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Authority | JAIN.AD.JP. IN SOA serial=3 |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
 Additional | <empty> |
 +---------------------------------------------------+
7. Possible Discussions
 Should partial RR modification allowed?
 Should AXFR is mandated periodically to protect the zone data from
 accumulated errors (theoretically there can be no error).
 What if default TTL changes? Should almost all RRs be retransmitted
 or special treatment is desired?
 Shouldn't transport mechanism over TCP modified to allow 4 bytes of
 message length field?
8. Acknowledgements
 The original idea of IXFR is conceived by Anant Kumar, Steve Hotz and
M. Ohta Expires on May 25, 1995 [Page 5]

INTERNET DRAFT Incremental Transfer in DNS November 1994
 Jon Postel.
 The simplified mechanism described in this memo is the product of the
 several hours of discussion between Anant Kumar and the Author.
9. Security Considerations
 Though DNS is related to several security problems, no attempt is
 made to fix them in this memo.
 This memo is believed to introduce no additional security problems to
 the existing DNS protocol.
10. Author's Address
 Masataka Ohta
 Tokyo Institute of Technology
 2-12-1, O-okayama, Meguro-ku,
 Tokyo 152, JAPAN
 Phone: +81-3-5734-3299
 Fax: +81-3-5734-3415
 EMail: mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp
M. Ohta Expires on May 25, 1995 [Page 6]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /