draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01

[フレーム]

Network Working Group P. Calhoun
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: September 14, 2008 March 13, 2008
 CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option
 draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01
Status of this Memo
 By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
 applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
 have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
 aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
 other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
 Drafts.
 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
 http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
 This Internet-Draft will expire on September 14, 2008.
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
Abstract
 The Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points Protocol
 allows a Wireless Termination Point to use DHCP to discover the
 Access Controllers it is to connect to. This document describes the
 DHCP options to be used by the CAPWAP protocol.
Table of Contents
 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 1.1. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 2. CAPWAP AC DHCPv4 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 3. CAPWAP AC DHCPv6 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
 7.2. Informational References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 12
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
1. Introduction
 The Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points Protocol
 (CAPWAP) [I-D.ietf-capwap-protocol-specification] allows a Wireless
 Termination Point (WTP) to use DHCP to discover the Access
 Controllers (AC) it is to connect to.
 Prior to the CAPWAP Discovery process, the WTP MAY use one of many
 methods to identify the proper AC to establish a CAPWAP connection
 with. One of these methods is through the DHCP protocol. This is
 done through the CAPWAP AC DHCPv4 or CAPWAP AC DHCPv6 Option.
1.1. Conventions used in this document
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
1.2. Terminology
 This document uses terminology defined in [RFC3753] and
 [I-D.ietf-capwap-protocol-specification].
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
2. CAPWAP AC DHCPv4 Option
 This section defines a DHCPv4 option that carries a list of 32-bit
 (binary) IPv4 addresses indicating one or more CAPWAP AC available to
 the WTP.
 The DHCPv4 option for CAPWAP has the format shown in the following
 figure:
 0 1
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | option-code | option-length |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | |
 + AC IPv4 Address +
 | |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | ... |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 option-code: OPTION_CAPWAP_AC_V4 (TBD)
 option-length: Length of the 'options' field in octets; MUST be a
 multiple of four (4).
 AC IPv4 Address: IPv4 address of a CAPWAP AC which the WTP may use.
 The ACs are listed in the order of preference for use by the WTP.
 A CAPWAP WTP, acting as a DHCPv4 client, SHOULD request the CAPWAP AC
 DHCPv4 Option in a Parameter Request List as described in [RFC2131]
 and [RFC2132].
 If configured with a (list of) CAPWAP AC address(es), a DHCPv4 server
 SHOULD send the client the CAPWAP AC DHCPv4 option, even if this
 option is not explicitly requested by the client.
 A CAPWAP WTP, acting as a DHCPv4 client, receiving the CAPWAP AC
 DHCPv4 option MAY use the (list of) IP address(es) to locate AC. The
 CAPWAP protocol [I-D.ietf-capwap-protocol-specification] provides
 guidance on the WTP's discovery process.
 The WTP, acting as a DHCPv4 client, SHOULD try the records in the
 order listed in the CAPWAP AC DHCPv4 option received from the DHCPv4
 server.
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
3. CAPWAP AC DHCPv6 Option
 This section defines a DHCPv6 option that carries a list of 128-bit
 (binary) IPv6 addresses indicating one or more CAPWAP AC available to
 the WTP.
 The DHCPv6 option for CAPWAP has the format shown in the following
 figure:
 0 1 2 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | option-code | option-length |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | |
 + +
 | |
 + AC IPv6 Address +
 | |
 + +
 | |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | .... |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 option-code: OPTION_CAPWAP_AC_V6 (TBD)
 option-length: Length of the 'options' field in octets; MUST be a
 multiple of sixteen (16).
 AC IPv6 Address: IPv6 address of a CAPWAP AC which the WTP may use.
 The ACs are listed in the order of preference for use by the WTP.
 A CAPWAP WTP, acting as a DHCPv6 client, SHOULD request the CAPWAP AC
 DHCPv6 Option in a Parameter Request List as described in [RFC2131]
 and [RFC2132].
 If configured with a (list of) CAPWAP AC address(es), a DHCPv6 server
 SHOULD send the client the CAPWAP AC DHCPv6 option, even if this
 option is not explicitly requested by the client.
 A CAPWAP WTP, acting as a DHCPv6 client, receiving the CAPWAP AC
 DHCPv6 option MAY use the (list of) IP address(es) to locate AC. The
 CAPWAP protocol [I-D.ietf-capwap-protocol-specification] provides
 guidance on the WTP's discovery process.
 The WTP, acting as a DHCPv6 client, SHOULD try the records in the
 order listed in the CAPWAP AC DHCPv6 option received from the DHCPv6
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
 server.
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 6]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
4. IANA Considerations
 The following DHCPv4 option code for CAPWAP AC option MUST be
 assigned by IANA:
 Option Name Value Described in
 -----------------------------------------------
 OPTION_CAPWAP_AC_V4 TBD Section 2
 The following DHCPv6 option code for CAPWAP AC options MUST be
 assigned by IANA:
 Option Name Value Described in
 ------------------------------------------------
 OPTION_CAPWAP_AC_V6 TBD Section 3
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 7]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
5. Security Considerations
 The security considerations in [RFC2131], [RFC2132] and [RFC3315]
 apply. If an adversary manages to modify the response from a DHCP
 server or insert its own response, a WTP could be led to contact a
 rogue CAPWAP AC, possibly one that then intercepts call requests or
 denies service. CAPWAP's use of DTLS MUST be used to authenticate
 the CAPWAP peers in the establishment of the session.
 In most of the networks, the DHCP exchange that delivers the options
 prior to network access authentication is neither integrity protected
 nor origin authenticated. Therefore, the options defined in this
 document are not the only methods used to determine which AC a WTP
 should connect to. The CAPWAP protocol
 [I-D.ietf-capwap-protocol-specification] defines other AC discovery
 procedures a WTP MAY utilize.
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 8]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
6. Acknowledgements
 The following individuals are acknowledged for their contributions to
 this protocol specification: Ralph Droms, Margaret Wasserman.
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 9]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
7. References
7.1. Normative References
 [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
 Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [RFC2131] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol",
 RFC 2131, March 1997.
 [RFC2132] Alexander, S. and R. Droms, "DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor
 Extensions", RFC 2132, March 1997.
 [RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
 and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
 IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.
 [I-D.ietf-capwap-protocol-specification]
 Calhoun, P., "CAPWAP Protocol Specification",
 draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-specification-10 (work in
 progress), March 2008.
7.2. Informational References
 [RFC3753] Manner, J. and M. Kojo, "Mobility Related Terminology",
 RFC 3753, June 2004.
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 10]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
Author's Address
 Pat R. Calhoun
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 170 West Tasman Drive
 San Jose, CA 95134
 Phone: +1 408-853-5269
 Email: pcalhoun@cisco.com
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 11]

Internet-Draft CAPWAP Access Controller DHCP Option March 2008
Full Copyright Statement
 Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
 retain all their rights.
 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
 THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
 OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
 THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
 made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
 this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
 ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Calhoun Expires September 14, 2008 [Page 12]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /