1
$\begingroup$

Here's a problem of CLRS:

Use the following ideas to develop a nonrecursive, linear-time algorithm for the maximum-subarray problem. Start at the left end of the array, and progress toward the right, keeping track of the maximum subarray seen so far. Knowing a maximum subarray of $A[1..j]$, extend the answer to find a maximum subarray ending at index $j + 1$ by using the following observation: a maximum subarray of $A[1..j + 1]$ is either a maximum subarray of $A[1..j]$ or a subarray $A[i..j + 1]$, for some 1ドル \leq i \leq j + 1$. Determine a maximum subarray of the form $A[i..j + 1]$ in constant time based on knowing a maximum subarray ending at index $j$.

Now this is a solution to it:

ITERATIVE-FIND-MAXIMUM-SUBARRAY(A)
 n = A.length
 max-sum = -∞
 sum = -∞
 for j = 1 to n:
 currentHigh = j
 if sum > 0:
 sum = sum + A[j]
 else
 currentLow = j
 sum = A[j]
 if sum > max-sum:
 max-sum = sum
 low = currentLow
 high = currentHigh
 return (low, high, max-sum)

I understand how max-sum is indeed the sum of a maximum subarray but I can't figure out how low and high are the indices of such a subarray. I don't know what the procedure is and how it updates these variables in each iteration. Any ideas?

asked Aug 7, 2021 at 5:45
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

sum computes the value of maximum subarray of the form $A[i..j+1]$. And, currentlow is $i$ and currenthigh is $j+1$. Note that currenthigh is incrementing in every iteration by 1ドル$ that means it is pointing to current $j$ always.

If sum>0 (value of maximum subarray of the form $A[i..j]$), then it is always better to make new-sum = sum + A[j+1] because then sum + A[j+1] > A[j+1,j+1] irrespective of whether $A[j+1]$ is negative or positive. Here, new-sum: value of maximum subarray of the form $A[i..j+1]$.

Similarly, if sum<0, then it is always better to make the new-sum = A[j+1,j+1] because sum + A[j+1] < A[j+1][j+1] irrespective of whether $A[j+1]$ is negative or positive.

Therefore, the correct sum is computed in the first if else statement.

After that, you are right that max-sum is the value of maximum subarray of $A[1,j+1]$. And, low and high are its indices. Note that they do not change unless sum > max-sum that should be the case as per the DP method.

answered Aug 7, 2021 at 6:16
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.