User talk:RoyZuo

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

With regard to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trinidad School in 1913.jpeg, please identify the publication in which this was published prior to 1926? I don't see a publication but you referenced it in your close. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

@Ellin Beltz: for US law, Publication has a technical meaning in copyright law. According to the statute, "Publication is the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending. The offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display constitutes publication. A public performance or display of a work does not of itself constitute publication." Generally, publication occurs on the date on which copies of the work are first made available to the public. For further information see Circular 1, Copyright Basics, section "Publication."

the photo was a group photo for the school in that year.

the only possibility for the photo to be "not published" is if the photo studio never gave the photo to anyone. since it was a group photo for a school, this would be highly unlikely. i think we can assume with confidence the photo must have been offered to the school or anyone in that photo. that distribution was publication.--RZuo (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

I find your interpretation interesting as so very many other situations have gone the other way. So you are saying that the day a photo is published in Facebook, or the day someone hands out a copy of an image starts the copyright clock? That's an interesting position, but one which rarely settles like that in Deletion Nominations. Could you provide some links to former situations where this has been applied? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

@Ellin Beltz: here's a 2012 discussion: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2012/07#Definition_of_Publication.

this kind of group photo was most probably a photo for the group to keep, and it was quite possibly a sale, unlike other kinds of studio portrait/artistic photographs of single persons which could just be for the photographers' personal enjoyment.--RZuo (talk) 22:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

FYI that photographers heirs just closed his studio due to Covid. I would be super careful on this one, but it was your close. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(中国大陆)‎ ∙ 中文(台灣)‎ ∙ 中文(简体)‎ ∙ 中文(繁體)‎ ∙ +/−

Hi RZuo, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

rubin16 (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

Excuse me, may I ask some help? recently on the DR page, the nominator complained about the notability of the source YouTube channel of the videos, but AFAIK, there is no "notability" requirement of the source of files on Commons imposed by many of the Wikipedia sites (see the differences between Wikipedia policies and Commons' ones ), and the use of files on Commons on other Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia articles ("If an article on the subject of the video exists, ..." the nominator said) is not necessarily demanded to offer educational value because files on Commons can also be used outside of Wikimedia projects(that's why files on Commons are freely licensed). For example there is no "All of these videos must be used in Wikipedia articles" restriction imposed such as these videos (Category:Videos_about_COVID-19) Also, the license info of the videos has been archived ("source" section of each description page of the videos) and CC license is irrevocable, and some of the videos has successfully been reviewed already, this is an example. (reviewed by user:Shizhao, user:AntiCompositeNumber) Puramyun31 (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

Hey RZuo, T Seen thanks. Can still do with more synergy. Josiah Eson Lewa (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

Marcus Cyron (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

--Minorax ^«¦talk¦» 12:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC).[reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Category moves have to be made upon community consensus. Don't do it merely on your own decision. Yasu (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Affected:

• File:Ljubljana Central Market from the Dragon Bridge.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 00:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi, I am answering there because at the category discussion started kind of edit war with the taylor. I do not like to delete the work of others - but for many uploads it would be the best solution! Instead of requesting deletion I collected poor & unused raster images in that category, with the main intention that not a user finds such an image and uses it. Better than to keep such crap would be to make good SVG files when needed. Unfortunately my categorizing was fighted by others, so I stopped my efforts; it is not so essential to me, I just had been trying to get a better ordering system. When you think of requesting deletion, it has my blessing -- sarang ♥사랑 10:26, 27 March 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

佢喺facebook有一個post寫明所有佢嘅相都係以Creative Commons放出。佢私底下同我講過佢用手機拍嘅相通常唔加字喺底,只有佢用專業相機影嗰啲相先會加。OhanaUnited ^{Talk page} 13:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi RZuo,

I think this picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sun_(195390785).jpeg&curid=71469905&diff=721876681&oldid=721875724) fits better in the previous category. We don't know where that picture was shoot. It was imported with other pictures and every single one has the same coordinates, which are clearly wrong, see for example this picture of Senglea in Malta: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sun_(195390773).jpeg that has coordinates that point to Alba County as well. Ivanbranco (talk) 17:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

@Ivanbranco: thx for telling me the coords are wrong! sorry i had no idea. but i just used google lens to find out that it's a fort in italy.

i removed your cat because panorama refers to a "wide-angle view" like File:Puesta de sol, desierto de Namib, Namibia, 2018年08月05日, DD 84-90 PAN.jpg, so here on commons we only categorise such images as panoramas.

how did you know that's "Senglea in Malta"? how come you dont change its cats?--RZuo (talk) 18:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

if i didnt discover it's forte rivoli, i would put it in Category:Unidentified mountains. RZuo (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:CirrusSearch#Explicit_sort_orders

change https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-VisualFileChange.js/ui.js#L-994 to defaultHeading = 'Files uploaded by [[' + vfc.mdUserPrefix + target + '|' + target + ']] ([[' + vfc.mdUserTalkPrefix + target + '|talk]] · [[' + vfc.mdContribPrefix + target + '|contribs]] · [[' + vfc.mdListFilesPrefix + target + '|uploads]])';

insert after https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-VisualFileChange.js/core.js#L-1892 mdListFilesPrefix: mw.config.get( 'wgFormattedNamespaces' )[ -1 ] + ':ListFiles/',

Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/02#Add_"upload_log"_link_to_heading_of_mass_DR_on_user

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=cantonese+deepcat%3A%22Books_uploaded_by_F%C3%A6%22

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search="author%3DOkänd" https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3A%E4%B8%8D%E8%A9%B3+insource%3A%2Futhor.%2A%3D.%2A%E4%B8%8D%E8%A9%B3%2F

https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/www.wikidata.org/RZuo/0/Wikidata:Project%20chat

\'\>([^\:\/]+?\.\S+?)\<\/a.+?used

• Photo challenge/2025 - March- Hiking
• Photo challenge/2025 - March- Newspapers

• bot to identify
  • bot to tag files
  • bot to list categories created
• bot report of categories that have a mix of latin and cjk chars

--RZuo (talk) 10:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for lending a hand on a couple of these. One note, I see you went from Panoramics in Australia to Panoramas of Australia. I have likewise been changing "panoramics" to "panoramas" but I have been leaving the "in" alone. I actually prefer "of" but that hadn't been discussed as far as I am aware. We should definitely clear up which participle to use for these before we go too much further with the renaming. Josh (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

@Joshbaumgartner: i had considered the problem. because the analogous cat trees Category:Photographs by country Category:Views by country "photographs" "views" all use "of", and https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/panorama_1 panorama is "a view of a wide area of land", i chose "of".

people may argue that, a panoramic picture of a city is not a "panorama of the country", and it's impossible to take a panoramic picture of the entire country, but likewise, a photograph of anything in the country is not a photograph of the entire country, yet the cat tree being "photographs of france" serves its purpose well. i think it's ok to adopt "panoramas of .." for all levels of the cat tree. RZuo (talk) 11:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

As said, I agree with "of". Note that "of" has evolved in our ontology and has a very broad scope. Basically, in any "primary topic of defining topic" category encompasses all instances of the primary topic that have a relation with the defining topic (see Of (relation) vs. In (relation)). Thus any panorama which has a relation to Australia can exist under Panoramas of Australia. Panoramas in Australia is potentially more limiting as the panoramas must be located within Australia and this could have some strange effects if taken seriously (for example if a panorama of Australia is on display in New York, is it a panorama in the United States at that point?). I would not worry much about whether the entirety of a location is captured by the panorama--a panorama depicting a part of Australia, is still a panorama of Australia. I suggest we go ahead and be bold and use 'of'. If someone sees a particular need to specify "in" later, that can be made as a sub-category of the "of" categories. Josh (talk) 13:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

@Joshbaumgartner i added notes about prepositions to Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/02/Category:Panoramics, and suggested Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/02/Category:Panoramics of cities. RZuo (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

OMG Thanks for finding the correct category for CategoryːPhotographs by Thomas Woodtli There are up to 1000̟ uncategorized images of his in Category:All_media_needing_categories_as_of_2021 I was moving to CategoryːImages by Thomas Woodtli Zurich Switzerland . How can they all be moved to the proper Cat? From mine and from the Uncategorized Cat? I tried CatALot but couldn't get it to work. Now i know where to move them individually but that's a lot of work.ǃ̃ Photo Archives (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

@Photo Archives: i can only suggest keep reading and trying Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot. that's the most useful tool to batch edit categories.

here are all the files by woodtli in "uncat 2021": https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=100&search=insource%3A%22Thomas+Woodtli%22+deepcat%3A%22All_media_needing_categories_as_of_2021%22 .

using catalot has another benefit, it can automatically remove {{Uncategorized}}.

however, you should not remove {{Uncategorized}} if you only moved the files to Category:Photographs by Thomas Woodtli, because the files still need to be categorised by topic Commons:Categories#How_to_categorize:_guidance_by_topic.

thx for helping. :D --RZuo (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Didn't do anything so I will move on to other things and leave them there. Thanks̃ Photo Archives (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi, The changes introduced recently produce an error, while this version doesn't. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

@Yann what and where do you see the error? Template:Motd/2023-07 Template:Motd/2024-02 all look kind of normal? RZuo (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Here: Template:Motd/Month. Yann (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

@Yann you mean "Error: Invalid time"? that doesnt matter. the template page is not intended for viewing anyway but being used by other pages. RZuo (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

OK, why does it appear now, while it didn't previously? Yann (talk) 19:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

are you sure? "previously" it also shows invalid time right?

reason is it's calling two parameters {{{year}}} and {{{month}}}, which are only filled on pages transcluding it. the error didnt matter (in my opinion), but i moved it inside includeonly anyway. RZuo (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Headlock0225 (talk) 11:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

--D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 01:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Please repair the template. After your edits this template is broken. Screen of Template:Motd/2023-07 with error: https://ibb.co/Sm8LMK9 . There was no problem until July 2023. Also @Yann (maybe he/she also know what's the problem and how to solve it). I also note: the Media of the Day don't mean only sounds. Why 80-90% of MOTD are not videos? Thanks. Brateevsky {talk} 13:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

with my limited coding skill and help from chatgpt, i found out the problem occurs if Template:Motd/Day/styles.css sets " div class="motd-day" in Template:Motd/Day " to "flex: 0". RZuo (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks, now it's better, I like it! Brateevsky {talk} 14:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

upon further investigation, i also found that, image, document and audio "flex" the same way, but video flex differently. my guess is there are changes to mediawiki's code regarding the video player. RZuo (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi. I was out on vacation and couldn't loop back on the village pump topic. I'm adding {{Check categories}} to the categories they've created and they've touched last. They're now all listed in Category:Media needing category review - No timestamp given. If you find some time, your help would be greatly appreciated to clean up this mess. Thanks. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

@Cryptic-waveform thx a lot. if you have any difficulty associated with east asian topics, plz feel free to notify me. RZuo (talk) 20:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

I am taking a break from (trying to) clean up the Uncategorized Cats and Media and will go through my "mess" and try and fix pages. Many are ok though since you directed my categorizing this last month o9r two, thanks Photo Archives (talk) 14:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Doesn't appear that my 1st reply was saved? I will begin to go through my "mess" and clean up as much as I can since your requests for changes and corrections over the past little while. Photo Archives (talk) 14:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Following your movement, you have to edit many templates. It can't be done by bot, it must be done manually. Fix it, please. Wieralee (talk) 15:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi, You moved this category without a redirect it is still linked to many user pages. Yann (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

{{move cat|User BG-2|User bitmap-2|reason=[[Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2023/08#Proposal:_rename_cat_tree_User_BG-x]]|user=RZuo}}

@Yann can you plz add this to User:CommonsDelinker/commands? see if it works.--RZuo (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

我建立模板也是被過濾器阻擋,前陣子我有找人協助,請看Solomon203對話頁。如你所見,那個模板到現在還是紅色,紅色即意指模板沒被建立。我等候多日,沒有人協助解決問題,因此我不知道該怎麼辦?--125.230.91.215 15:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

只有已登錄用戶才能新建頁面。

請提出解封申請。(明年1月份或2025年1月份應該比較有把握。) RZuo (talk) 16:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

解封申請是什麼?現在過濾器又阻擋我對照片添加道路有關的分類,比如這張:國六埔里端.jpg。上次你說「除非有更多的疑似誤判」,我不知道你說的「多」是想要多少才算多?--125.230.90.219 18:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

經過半個月對很多照片的編輯,現在我已經可以確定,過濾器的確只針對「道路標示牌」進行阻擋。也就是說,只要照片有拍攝道路標示牌,我想添加其類別,過濾器會阻止我添加。這應該可以算是過濾器的錯誤吧?正如上次我報告,過濾器提供的紅色訊息是An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed。我看不出自己的編輯哪裡會potentially unconstructive?上次我找人請求將過濾器設定修正,現在也沒有修正過來,所以我想請問你是否有辦法?--125.230.90.173 10:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

如果你已經有賬號,但賬號被封,請提出解封申請。(2025年1月應該比較有把握。如果我看見,我會解封你。)

如果你從未有過賬號,請創建1個新賬號。

你也可以繼續不用賬號編輯,請你繼續在其他方面貢獻吧,不要執著這個過濾器阻擋的範圍。 RZuo (talk) 10:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

其他方面也不行,因為我不小心編輯出錯,結果Yann不同意我恢復版本。請看這裡。--125.230.89.198 14:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

我給人家的分類清空,原本應該是重定向到另一分類,我卻誤用成快速刪除,所以Yann就看到分類清空就刪除了。--125.230.89.198 14:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

上次就有人以為我在搞破壞,人家給我指正,要我重定向,而不是製造清空頁面而提交快速刪除。這一次你能否幫幫忙呢?--125.230.89.198 14:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Yann手快,刪了,那就算了吧,小事不必計較。 RZuo (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

I have now followed up on this at the Wikidata project chat.

KaiKemmann (talk) 16:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

新年快乐!感谢您孜孜不倦地整理图书!

維基小霸王 (talk) 04:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I forked another script that helps copy section titles (for interwiki linking purposes) in one click. Take a look at User:TheAafi/InterwikiLinksCopier.js ─ The Aafī (^talk ) 14:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@TheAafi and Nardog: thx a lot! it works very well! i will fork it to make the button way bigger though. :P

Nardog's scripts are amazing! i'm already using a few. RZuo (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I second. I am trying to change the text to a beautiful clipboard instead. Hopefully sometime later. But it works pretty much. I will also include internationalisation in it. ─ The Aafī (^talk ) 19:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I am sorry about the accidental miscategorization of categories. It seems my cat-a-lot settings were not properly working Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 19:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

RZuo,我發現照片只要是從 instagram、youtube 等外部網站取來,下方的版權資訊會顯示綠色,比如陳子語、許光漢,這綠色是代表照片通過版權複查,不過我有個問題。有人上傳的照片是從 https://tcmb.culture.tw/ 或者從 https://tcmb.culture.tw/ 等網站取來,這是否需要通過版權複查?

此外,我也看見有些照片是來自政府機關,比如學生照取自教育部、舞獅照取自臺灣鐵路管理局,這些在下方的版權資訊會顯示綠色,可是這綠色是因為{{GWOIA}}宣稱照片是依據政府機關的版權聲明,並沒有像 instagram、youtube 那樣有另外找人通過版權複查。對於這種情況,你認為照片來自政府機關是否需要通過版權複查?

我明白版權複查是為了避免照片的版權資訊與外部網站不一致,藉由複查就能知道照片是不是侵犯版權,可是真正會侵犯版權的人是不會提供來源給我們複查,因為我在對照片張貼{{LicenseReview}}模板來請求版權複查,有人對此提出質疑,所以當照片取自外部網站,版權複查是否必要,我開始感到懷疑,因此有上述二個問題。

無論他們是從哪個網站上傳至 commons 這裡,其實照片量是非常多,每一個外部網站上傳的照片量是以「千」起跳。如果每一個要版權複查,人工恐怕是查不完,就連我張貼{{LicenseReview}}也是沒有張貼完。然而,我擔心的是這些照片沒有經過版權複查,未來有天一旦照片來源顯示的網站消失(對方將網頁移除或者關閉網站),可能會被人認定有版權問題而遭到刪除,所以我為了避免他們承受這種刪除風險,我才會張貼{{LicenseReview}}來請求複查。即使我的想法是好,但是有人不能接受,因為他們認為自己就可以依照網站提供的版權聲明來審查自己上傳的照片。我覺得他們有道理,因此我就沒有繼續張貼{{LicenseReview}}。不過我就不明白,我們為什麼還需要另外找人對照片進行版權複查呢?--125.230.92.149 14:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Dear RZuo, thank you so much for your recognition in the form of a Barnstar. This is my first award I've received here on Wikimedia. Best regards--Υ.Γ. (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Günther Frager (talk) 20:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Just to let you know I've requested undeletion on this one (Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:A fabulous birthday (23491654620).jpg), I was halfway through voting keep for more or less the same reasons as you when it was closed. Belbury (talk) 18:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi RoyZuo,

• you've moved category:Amcor to Category:Amcor (Israeli company) and didn't provide a Reason to the moving action. What's the reason?
• As you decided to change a category to be a redirect page - why are you leaving all the images connected to the redirect page?

Thanks, Gveret Tered (talk) 07:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@Gveret Tered: hi, there's a bigger company Amcor. a bot will move the files. thx :) --RoyZuo (talk) 18:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks! Gveret Tered (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Prototyperspective (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi RoyZuo , I wanted to thank you for nominating [1], I very much appreciate it, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello RoyZuo

I noticed you mentioned on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343131#9887951 that "that out of the 7 million in Category:Files with no machine-readable author, 3.8 are DPLA uploads. but they had author info in their source repos."

I was considering implementing a bot run to fetch that information and adding them to the files (that would then require an authorization of new task, but step-by-step). Do you have details on where to find it on DPLA from their link and how it should be presented on the file page ?

Platonides (talk) 00:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@Platonides it seems the presence of author info is not consistent.

File:Some Lonesome Night- Fox Trot - DPLA - d33915de85d21f7d9b9f19f62b9dedf5 (page 17).jpg, follow the DPLA identifier, you will see "Creator Buffano, Jules, 1897-1960"

but File:Homemaking Institute Programs- 1951-1967 - DPLA - 9af7990942c755ee161b10dbcfee9cd2 (page 31).jpg dpla is dead; File:An Elegy on the Death and Burial of Cock Robin - DPLA - page 05.jpg has no creator info on dp.la .

still, if you harvest the ones that have "creator", i think it's a big step forward. RoyZuo (talk) 00:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

File:Simonides woman-2 - DPLA - 8b83011ec41404b9fa88f082b4c324ab.jpg creator info was imported, but in non-machine readable format. it needs to be converted to artist / author parameter of {{Artwork}}. RoyZuo (talk) 00:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

oh snap, i didnt see clearly. actually probably all those with creator info from dp.la have had that info imported, but they are in the strange format.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=deepcategory%3A%22Files_with_no_machine-readable_author%22+insource%3A%2FInFi+%5C%7C+Creator%2F accounts for half of the dpla uploads.

just need a regex replace, to convert for example

| Other fields 1 = {{ InFi | Creator | United States. Works Progress Administration; United States. Work Projects Administration }}

to

| author = United States. Works Progress Administration; United States. Work Projects Administration RoyZuo (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@Platonides an edit like https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=960771895 would solve the problem for probably as many as 2 million such files. RoyZuo (talk) 08:32, 25 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

but it's questionable whether most dpla uploads should even use {{Artwork}}, which adds them to Category:Artworks without Wikidata item, but most of them are not artworks and dont deserve a wd item. RoyZuo (talk) 08:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

PS: You probably to update your Phab profile so it links to RoyZuo as MediaWiki user instead of RZuo Platonides (talk) 00:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 23:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

In this version of File:2020年12月13日 南京大屠杀死难者国家公祭日:中俄学生齐聚抗战馆共唤和平.webm, the file is tagged as the MOTD of 2023年12月13日. According to Template:Motd/2023-12-13 (and also judging on MOTD's description), it was intended to be the MOTD for that day in April, but was abruptly changed to File:高耀潔:抗艾滋必須實事求是.webm by you.

Are there any reasons or discussion behind the change?廣九直通車 (talk) 07:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@廣九直通車 it contains montages of unsourced photos, without any info about country of origin, author, publication date, etc. They are quite likely still in copyright (assume their source of country might have life+70, then the photographers must have been dead before 2025-70=1955 for them to be in pd now, which is not very likely).

So i swapped it out.

The replacement was chosen coz Gao just passed away a few days prior. RoyZuo (talk) 08:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

From 1m22s onward. Particularly, 1m37s is by Olga Vsevolodovna Ignatovitsj (Q4197476) who died in 1984.--RoyZuo (talk) 08:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

 Thank you. Will consider whether a DR is needed based on your comments.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

FYI, the deletion request has been filed at here.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, I noticed only just recently that this could be a problem, though I’ve edited several of the uploaded files over the time: Files are uploaded by User:RoyZuoMedia, clearly readable in the file upload history, but the visible author in the information box is Roy Zuo. I would appreciate it if you – while you are logged in as RoyZuo – would add some lines on the user page of RoyZuoMedia making it clear that both accounts belong together. And probably also RoyZuoMedia should add a similar information here on the user page of RoyZuo. — Speravir – 00:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Or vice versa? RoyZuoMedia writes on their user page and you as RoyZuo on your user page that you both belong together? — Speravir – 01:13, 14 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

@Speravir the usernames are self explanatory; the user talk page is a redirect; my surname is rare. I think users would not possibly reasonably have a different expectation that the accounts belong to two different people. Because of the user talk redirect, any message to that page is automatically forwarded here. RoyZuo (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Oh, I had not noticed the redirect. — Speravir – 01:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

1945@gmail.com 2001:FB1:E1:3CCB:1B3:3431:C7FD:C3F0 01:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science&oldid=1274804439#Word_for_fruit_defect%EF%BC%9F Trade (talk) 10:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]