User talk:M.Komorniczak
Add topic
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy . You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki —it is really easy.
More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk , village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.
- Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
- All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
- Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
- Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
- To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
- If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
- Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
- For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
Nie wiem Michale, gdzie częściej zaglądasz, ale na Wiki zostawiłem Tobie wiadomość żebyś rzucił okiem i ustosunkował się do tego. Albertus teolog (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations! Renal corpuscle.svg , which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Correct and good quality illustration. Lycaon 08:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Reply
The image File:Renal corpuscle.svg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Renal corpuscle.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.
a 8 maja będzie to grafika dnia... Albertus teolog (talk) 23:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Reply
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ +/−
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Artykul na medal-MK.svg is uncategorized since 4 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Dobry Artykul-MK.svg is uncategorized since 4 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Propozycja LnM.svg is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Artykul na Medal 1.svg is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Propozycja LnM2.svg is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Propozycja GnM1.svg is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Propozycja GnM3.svg is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Propozycja DA.svg is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:Propozycja GnM2.svg is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Image:M.Komorniczak-logo-S.png was uncategorized on 19 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC) Reply
dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
This message was added automatically by Nikbot , if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk . --Filnik 15:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nephron-urine.svg Thank you so much for that great image! But could you maybe create an english version of that image as well? That would really simplify things a lot :) Chodid (talk) 10:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Reply
dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
This message was added automatically by Nikbot , if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk . --Filnik 14:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Please have a look at the changes i made to the english version of this diagram: File:TRNA ribosomes diagram en.svg thankyou.-LadyofHats (talk) 12:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations! Tanner scale-female.svg , which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Ideally the Tanner scale should show how and when the pubic hair distribution extends onto the inner medial thighs beyond the "triangle". -Stickpen 16:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Info This image based in the information and diagrams (you can find it in sources) -- M.Komorniczak 11:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)<Reply
useful, in use in different wikis, technically good --Mbdortmund 19:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tanner scale - female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
(削除) Oppose - this is not a proper / properly formatted scope --Rastaman3000 (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC) (削除ここまで)Reply- I fixed that. Yann (talk) 00:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Neutral - scope fixed, yet I cannot tell whether it is the best image for this scope. --Rastaman3000 (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Request For a nonspecialist, the nominated image looks pretty much like this one (three first columns), which is the third source given in the image description. In this description, the link points to that simple slide without any mention of copyright, but the full reference quoted as source n°3 is a book, still sold (ISBSN-13: 978-1859962527). One can find its digital version on Google books, till the page "Tanner stages". A problem, perhaps: of course, this rather recent book is a copyright-protected work, with a mention "All rights reserved". So my question is: isn't there any copyrighting issue for the presently nominated derivative work? --Myrabella (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Info My work is a derivative of many sources. That truth is most similar to that specified by you. But there is also a vector version of this foto: [[1]]. I gave all the sources which are used - I don't hide that. This image is connection of sources and my teoretical knowledge. But i'm not specialist of copyright. --M•Komorniczak -talk- 16:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
![[1]](/index.cgi/contrast/http://www.uptodateonline.com/online/content/images/endo_pix/Tanner_staging_breasts.jpg){kind=link}
- Thanks for your transparency. I'm afraid the other source you mention might be copyrighted too. The photo comes from the site uptodateonline.com. One must suscribe to be allowed to crawl the whole site, and we can read in the page License Agreement: "PROHIBITED USES: Except as expressly permitted in this Agreement, any copying, distribution or modification of the Licensed Materials is strictly prohibited." --Myrabella (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- I understand that, however this is not this image - but only image "inspired" by. If we interpret that restrictively copyright that this image File:RNA splicing diagram en.svg also break the licens (look to sources: [2]). I understand this prohibition (copyright) that I can't put original image/foto to webpage - but if I make fusion of many image, and change information (or draw from foto) that is legal. But I say again I'm not a specialist. I can change image if you think that is needed. --M•Komorniczak -talk- 21:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- About File:RNA splicing diagram en.svg: the source leads up to Wiley copyright, which says: "Nothing on this Web site or in the Wiley publications and material may be downloaded, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, modified, made available on a network, used to create derivative works, (and so on)"—however, it is not that image reviewed now. The nominated image seems unique for this scope on Commons and very valuable but it is quite similar to the original sources (drawing and photo) and I would like to be sure that there isn't any copyright infringement. --Myrabella (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Made the changes - if you click on the picture you see - how it looks now. M•Komorniczak -talk- 00:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- About File:RNA splicing diagram en.svg: the source leads up to Wiley copyright, which says: "Nothing on this Web site or in the Wiley publications and material may be downloaded, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, modified, made available on a network, used to create derivative works, (and so on)"—however, it is not that image reviewed now. The nominated image seems unique for this scope on Commons and very valuable but it is quite similar to the original sources (drawing and photo) and I would like to be sure that there isn't any copyright infringement. --Myrabella (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- I understand that, however this is not this image - but only image "inspired" by. If we interpret that restrictively copyright that this image File:RNA splicing diagram en.svg also break the licens (look to sources: [2]). I understand this prohibition (copyright) that I can't put original image/foto to webpage - but if I make fusion of many image, and change information (or draw from foto) that is legal. But I say again I'm not a specialist. I can change image if you think that is needed. --M•Komorniczak -talk- 21:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Thanks for your transparency. I'm afraid the other source you mention might be copyrighted too. The photo comes from the site uptodateonline.com. One must suscribe to be allowed to crawl the whole site, and we can read in the page License Agreement: "PROHIBITED USES: Except as expressly permitted in this Agreement, any copying, distribution or modification of the Licensed Materials is strictly prohibited." --Myrabella (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Support - Unique picture for the scope on Commons. I was hesitating regarding the copyright, but one might argue that it is inspired by other images but not copied; moreover, most of the layout, including the exact proportional differences of details between the different stages, is predetermined by academic facts (or theories) and thus could be not eligible for copyright (arguments suggested by Martin H., thanks to him). Nevertheless, it is a layperson's opinion, as mine. --Myrabella (talk) 21:56, 21 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
Stunning images. Thank you!
Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:
- osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia
Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości
- fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
- zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców
Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.
E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.
Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf
Pozdrowienia,
Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010
Hello. I'm making one/some images of glomerular pathology using you Renal Corpuscle.svg to start out with. All my changes will be in the public domain. Do you approve if I make the entire image(s) in the public domain or would you like me to point out that your work is Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported? I recognize the benefits of a share alike license, but as a intellectual property abolitionist I do everything public domain.
- Sorry, this image is licensed (CC3.0 Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported) and modifications require Attribution and Share Alike this license. Sincerely, M•Komorniczak -talk- 15:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations! Tanner scale-male.svg , which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. --Carschten 16:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Vinne2 (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations! Stomach mucosal layer labeled.svg , which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 22:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations! Paranasal sinuses numbers.svg , which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks great! --Kaldari 20:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paranasal sinuses .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
- CommentComply the alphabetical order for languages in the caption. Attach the scope to a category is useful.
- Support Very good work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Reply
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Bulwersator (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Reply
I worked hard on your drawing, modifying it according to the instructions of a dentist. If you think you can adapt to your language. I use Inkscape.
--Jmarchn (talk) 18:07, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Reply
Hi Michal,
I really like the amazing work you've done on the Tanner scale diagram here - it's absolutely perfect :) I'm currently working on an article on the similar-ish "Prader Scale" - see w:en:User:Alison/Prader scale which is an endocrinological article relating to genital differentiation in utero and genital presentation in newborns. This is of interest to subjects like congenital adrenal hyperplasia, complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, partial androgen insensitivity syndrome and general article on intersex conditions. The article is coming along fine, but it really, really needs an illustration of the seven stages conceived by Dr. Andrea Prader. Would you be willing to provide an illustration to go with this article? I would really really appreciate it if you could! :) Examples here, here and here Thank you *so* much!! - Alison ❤ 00:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Girabbit85 (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC) Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Snowmanradio (talk) 11:43, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Affected:
And also:
Request to correct misclassification of distal straight tubule as distal convoluted tubule in File:Renal corpuscle.svg
[edit ]Hi! Thank you so much for creating File:Renal corpuscle.svg. It was really helpful in helping me understand the renal corpuscle, but my professor at New York Medical College states that the tubule involved in the extraglomerular apparatus is actually distal straight tubule and not distal convoluted tubule (the thick ascending tubule before the DCT). Could you amend this, or help send me a file where I could make the appropriate correction? Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC) Reply