Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcut: COM:CID Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas , entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.

Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

• {{Support}} ( Support),
• {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
• {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
• {{Comment}} ( Comment),
• {{Info}} ( Info),
• {{Question}} ( Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

• Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
• Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
• Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
• Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
• Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

• estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
• que haya un mínimo de siete votos a favor
• que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)
• si a partir del quinto día, la candidatura tiene al menos diez votos a favor y ninguno en contra, automáticamente será destacada (regla del quinto día)

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:42:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
•  Info The lake side of the Rheinsberg Palace. All by me --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Lovely reflections and lovely architecture Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:39:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
•  Info Interior with the three winged altars of the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Good evocation of a modest but lovely church Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Scenic and loads of details to explore at sharp full resolution Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support —Bruce1ee ^talk 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Nice! You somehow have given it the look of an ink drawing with watercolor rendering. --Cart (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  12:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support This is pretty great - unusual but effective composition, excellent light Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Impressive. Looking at it reminds me a little of Canaletto's paintings. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 05:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
•  Info Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on an overgrown heathland in mild evening light.
  All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 02:59:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support A well balanced composition that highlights the striking blue windows as a focal point. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Bland building, but the 'Hopper-ish' composition makes it work. --Cart (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support per Cart. Painterly. A study in cream and blue colours. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 19:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak oppose Nice architecture but the harsh midday light doesn't help to distinguish the roof and the ground floor -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Thank you for the review, I've tried to soften the light and reduce the shadows a little. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support I know what Basile Morin means, the house is a little bit dark under the harsh light and blends into the background. Nevertheless I love it. Great choice to go for a square composition to focus on the house. It's a really interesting subject and I love how the angular and jagged roof looks like one of the mountain peaks. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 17:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
•  Info created & uploaded by Dipu ME-12 – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Very good moment but not sharp enough IMO. Sorry--Ermell (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak oppose Sorry but per Ermell, not really focussed properly and only 6 megapixels, hence not FP for me despite excellent moment and good composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 10:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
•  Info created & uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

 Comment FP Gallery can be specify with Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves). ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Oppose Sorry but in my opinion oversharpened which I struggle to overlook at this relatively low resolution Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support though quality can be better I still like the subject. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 00:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Icteridae_(Icterids)
•  Info Common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), a kind of blackbird. I like that this shot captures some of its feathers' iridescence. Fun fact: a group of grackle sis called a "plague". :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Beautiful bird and great compo with the helpful twig matching the shapes of the bird. --Cart (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Laridae (Gulls, terns and skimmers)
•  Info created by Princepauljoy – uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support It's a bit noisy but still a spectacular capture Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support per Cmao20 --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Sorry, too noisy and oversharpened for my taste. The scene itself though is fantastic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Neutral Imho, the bokeh doesn't look entirely natural. Nevertheless, the scenery is magnificent, a fortunate moment to have captured in a photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 17:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
•  Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala, an Indian State. In this photo documented live performance of a Theyyam.
• All by --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment Please, per the rules, could you write a good description in the |description = box on the file page. This is so that people searching for photos can find it easier, and so all of us living outside Kerala can have a better understanding about what the photo depicts. Like who is the dancer supposed to be, are there any specific meanings for the colors and different items on the costume, are the dancers men or female, when and for how long is the dance/celebration. We foreigners would love to hear about such things. ;) Thank you. --Cart (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Done --Shagil Kannur (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  •  Support Thank you. Striking image and interesting description. Information about an image always makes it more valuable. --Cart (talk) 09:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support --Yann (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Impressive pose, striking and colorful composition. Thank you very much for the detailed description. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment Please Ranjithsiji and Shagil Kannur, you should never rename and move a file during a FPC nomination, unless you know exactly what you are doing. The move broke all the links necessary for the FPC system to work. I have now cleaned up that mess for you and everything is fine, but in the future fix re-naming before or after the nomination, never during. Thank you. --Cart (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Dear Cart. I apologise for the problems caused by me. I used the mass rename script to rename all the files because the main subject of the file was different. It is an intolerable factual error in the case of file name. But I did not noticed this exact FPC. Sorry for the problems. I will be careful in future and thank you for your quick help. Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Sure, I’ll be more careful next time. The names were incorrectly given for the 157 photos I uploaded. With Ranjithsiji’s help, all the misnamed files have been corrected, including this one. Once again, I apologize for the mistake.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  I understand. Please just ask some experienced FPC-user for help or give some warning if you need to move any files here at FPC. We can always make things work, we just need to know so we can keep your nominations safe. --Cart (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 12:37:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
•  Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support I like it --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Motif, sharpness, resolution, colors and light are convincing. --Milseburg (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support as per Milseburg. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
• (削除) Cmao20--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ]

• Not sure what you meant to say here Shagil Kannur, was this intended to be a vote? Cmao20 (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Mobile editing error. Sorry for this time. Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support per Milseburg. – Aristeas (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 11:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Bread
•  Info Plain vanilla muffin, newly baked and photographed on crumpled baking paper. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Simple, golden brown, fragrant - you can almost smell the vanilla. A feast for the eyes, but sadly not for my taste buds! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

• If you're ever in the neighborhood, I'll make you some. :) I'm so very glad you are well enough to participate here again! You've been missed. --Cart (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

• Oh, that sounds amazing! Thank you so much! I'm doing my best - pain is a stubborn companion, but good company (and the thought of vanilla muffins) helps :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support Pleasant and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 12:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Appetizing and atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment This looks delicious, but I don't like the background paper. Yann (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  When you bake muffins like this, there is always a risk that one or some of them will tip a bit and spill onto the sheet pan. To prevent the messy burning and the following cleaning, a baking paper is often used to cover the pan. It can be re-used between the batches even if it's wrinkled and slightly burned. I liked the texture of it, so I included it. More interesting than a plain flat surface to me, but that's a matter of taste. --Cart (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Weak support There is like a yellow cast in my view, and I think the light could have been better with limited shadow in the foreground. I also share Yann's view on the paper background. However, the composition is fine and it's an appetizing FPC of food -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak support Bad background. And what is special for this image?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 05:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
•  Info oak-apple still attached to an oak leaf, sunk in a carpet of leaves under tall trees. Focus stack of 33 photos.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment @Famberhorst: , please, check the contour of the little water layer below the fungus. There is a cloning effect on its right-hand side end. --Harlock81 (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

• ✓ Done @Harlock81: If I understand the place correctly, the error has been corrected. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Yes, it was there.  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support --Cart (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Interesting photo subject. Thanks for the retouching! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Another good focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 02:03:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
•  Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak oppose I quite like the choice to have a vertical composition here, it's brave and helps highlight the layers in the waves and the rocks. But personally I can't see enough outstanding in terms of motif, light (which is quite harsh) or quality to make this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose It lacks wow in my view, and I don't like the composition with tight crop bottom and top. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 01:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
•  Info created by Adolphe Jean-Baptiste Bayot after Carl Nebel, restored, uploaded, ans nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Nice view of the Zócalo with the Cathedral. – Aristeas (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 11:24:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
•  Info The roofed section with shop signs of Fredsgatan, a prestigious shopping street in Gothenburg, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Sorry for the perspective at first sight. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Perspective is intentional for a dynamic impression. It is corrected based on the opening at the end of the arcade, which is horisontal and straight. Not all architecture photos need to follow the "FP church aisle perspective". --Cart (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Oppose Sorry but I agree with Moheen. It's directly visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Of course it's visible when it's intentional. If you don't like it, that's fine, but it's not something that accidentally happened to the photo or something I forgot to fix. The whole idea here is to play with the strong lines in the scene, treating it as something almost abstract. --Cart (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support It's a matter of taste. For me the dynamic impression is successful.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support It works also for me. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment (削除) I wold clean CA, anoted. Picture is not so bad. (削除ここまで) --Mile (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Fixed Thanks for the tip! Talk about having a blind spot in your own photo. :) --Cart (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support The architectural arrangement and perspective lends a pleasing depth and draws the eye into the distance. In addition, the interplay of light and shadow adds dynamism to the scene and, for me personally, a sense of clarity and structure. The mentioned CA's are not prominently visible, but can be removed (especially on the Junkyard clothing store logo). -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Let's see. Good aperture, quality fine, and something different. One out of "normal". --Mile (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Light is well handled but the content with commercial signs is uninteresting in my subjective view, sorry (no wow) and I don't like the angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --imehling (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Not quite per Basile: I like the angle of view and the subtle perspective correction, but I'm not a fan of the HDR look (lifted shadows, toned-down highlights, punchy colours). Difficult shot and interesting nomination, nonetheless -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 08:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
•  Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Neutral Nice and appealing composition but not quite the quality you'd expect from a panorama. The structures and rocks work but the greenery looks very "Minecraft-y". --Cart (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support I think the green looks something like this in January.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose, too low-quality. The detail is lost at high magnification. JayCubby (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support weakish because the details at full size are not that good but I love the colours and the panoramic composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Neutral Beautiful colours and arrangement, but the light is a bit unfortunate, making the buildings look rather flat and overexposed, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 16:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 02:34:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Scolopacidae_(Typical_Waders)
•  Info American woodcock (Scolopax minor), a plump, goofy shorebird of the forest floor that dances back and forth to search for worms in the ground. Typically very skittish and often challenging to find, for some reason they really like this one urban park in Manhattan, with a couple turning up each year. Makes it one of the few places where you can actually get a reasonably close shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Excellent capture. The birds were on that land long before NY was built, glad to hear that some are not giving up their claim. ;-) --Cart (talk) 10:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Ermell (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Good picture of a bird in its environment Cmao20 (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 02:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
•  Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Nice and calm enough, but the foreground looks a bit overexposed and even a minimalistic beach FP needs some element that captures your attention and makes it stand out among all other beaches, but I can't see that here. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 10:51, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose The overexposed foreground is for me the main problem of the picture, sorry. --Harlock81 ( talk) 19:30, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose per Harlock81 -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 20:57:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Crocodylidae (Crocodiles)
•  Info Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus), Masai Mara, Kenya. This species is widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa and generally, the adult male Nile crocodile is between 3.5 and 5 m (11 ft 6 in and 16 ft 5 in) in length and weighs 225 to 750 kg (496 to 1,653 lb). Nile crocodiles are very aggressive and opportunistic apex predators, that are capable of taking almost any animal within their range. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support This one looks very smug about being an apex predator. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support To me he looks terrifying.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Were you close, or did you use "just" a good photographic objective? Of course, I'm joking. I agree with Famberhorst about the frightening look of the crocodile, albeit asleep. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:49, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Huge wow and superb quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Per Cart. (The comparison with the smile of some contemporary political predators is left as an exercise to the reader.) – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Nice light, eye-catching close-up and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --imehling (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 21:54:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
•  Info created by Azimronnie – uploaded by Azimronnie – nominated by Myrealnamm -- Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support At first glance, I didn't understand that they are walking in the water. Interesting subject. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 06:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 12:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:44, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support interesting --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Beautiful, nice find, thank you for the nomination! – Aristeas (talk) 19:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Stunning! And nobody seems to be looking up at the drone, lending additional candour to the shot. -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 20:23:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Groups
•  Info created by Eugène Delacroix / Louvre Museum, uploaded by Shonagon nominated by Yann
•  Info Liberty Leading the People is one of the most famous French painting. It has influenced many people, including Victor Hugo and Bartholdi for the Statue of Liberty. It has also always been controversial, partly due to the representation of bare-breasted woman, and partly due to violence atmosphere of the scene.
•  Support Very high resolution, reproduction after a recent restoration. The difference with earlier copies is amazing. -- Yann (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Very good. Always feels odd to see an artwork you're so used to seeing, after a restoration. --Cart (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Through the depiction of idealism and realism, we are reminded of how far we should not go to realize ideals. Iconic masterpiece, excellent restoration. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Msb (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support per Cart and Radomianin. At the first glance the restored colours are surprising, but they make sense: seems that Delacroix wanted the entire painting to be dominated by the French national colors. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 10:28, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 19:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
•  Info created by A S M Jobaer – uploaded by A S M Jobaer – nominated by A S M Jobaer -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment Please make sure that the gallery links work and goes to the right place, when you create a nomination. I have fixed this for you now, but you need to do that in the future. --Cart (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Thank you so much A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  I am new here and I really don't know how to edit these kind of posts. If you help me I will edit more carefully and better than before A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  You edit by clicking on the "edit" at the top of the nomination page and then follow the instruction that appear in the editing window. You can also read how to make these the correct way on the COM:FPC page. It has rules and instructions. Good luck now! --Cart (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Oppose Delicious fruit but awkward composition in my view. Out of focus ginger and distracting corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Good-looking berries, but the whole composition is too messy for me. --Cart (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose I don't like the messy background with all the berry smears. The motif has potential but the image in general is not FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 17:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Asia
•  Info created by はにしな – uploaded by はにしな – nominated by Halowand -- Halowand (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Halowand (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:17:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
•  Info Beach crossing De Kerf in the Schoorl dunes. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Amazing landscape, but the image is too blurry, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support It looks sharp to me, and don't forget it's 36 megapixels Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak support Yes, it could use a bit more sharpness and contrast, but it's also extremely beautiful. As lovely as beach dunes are, they are also tricky to work into a good compo, so well done for this. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support very nice mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Nice composition and mood. In places like these dunes it’s often difficult to find a typical view which condenses the essence of the landscape in a single image; here this has been achieved. – Aristeas (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --imehling (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
•  Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Crop is too large, in my opinion. The high level of blur of the foreground is distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Sorry but not sufficient depth of field for me and the large amount of blurry foreground is distracting, good butterfly pic nevertheless but a little short of some recent ones we've seen at FPC Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:19:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
•  Info created by Rusho127 – uploaded by Rusho127 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Nice capture. --Mile (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Nice composition--Anitava Roy (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 19:22, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Impressive uniformity and a stunning array of colors. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  12:48, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support-- Tanvir Rahat (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Tolles Foto. Die gleichmäßigen Formen, die Symmetrie und die verschiedenen Farben entzücken das Auge --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Pretty neat, wouldn't be surprised to see this do well at POTY Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support An extra ordinary, stunning image. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support per Radomianin and PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Strong support Awesome patchwork and pixelation effect. Great to look at full size. Also per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support One of the best drone images I've seen! -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --A.Savin 11:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --imehling (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
•  Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose Unexceptional mountain image, in my view. Harsh shadows, hazy background and dull light. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment The landscape is awesome, but perhaps the photo would benefit from a little more light and a square crop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.carter (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

• ✓ Done Thanks. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --imehling (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  •  Support Thanks! For me this brings out the layers in the scene better and the trees sits more balanced in the composition. --Cart (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support Dramatic and satisfying composition for me despite edge sharpness being only OK Cmao20 (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support For the new version.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Impressive landscape in my eyes – with the distinctive trees on the steep rock and the rising clouds it reminds me of Chinese landscape paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info created by Mahinur11 – uploaded by Mahinur11 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak support Editing quality could be better, but it's striking, unusual motif that makes you happy to view. I also like that your nominations have good descriptions and categories, that makes it easier for users who are searching for specific photos to find these. --Cart (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
• I think it is oversaturated (see the woman's face). I would support with less saturation. Yann (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  I think you are right. Any chance of fixing this Kaim Amin? --Cart (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Yeah, I noticed the oversaturation too. I'll try to upload a fixed image. Kaim (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

   Oppose until it is fixed. Yann (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Somehow. Crop could be better, to put her head on up-left third, or , to remove sand border on both sides - crop or strecth size. --Mile (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC) p.S. Here, i would try this option too. @Kaim Amin [reply ]
•  Weak support Per Cart --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Oppose in its current form. Mile's crop is definitely superior, and the saturation as pointed by Yann has also not been fixed. A renaming is also required for a more descriptive title. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Too many issues as such, would support if all fixes are implemented. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Comment Interesting but could be improved, per above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2025 at 13:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
•  Info No FPs of this place. Just great light and satisfying composition. created by I.Mahesh – uploaded by I.Mahesh – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment It's really great that you keep finding photos from new places and new photographers, but in doing so, would you please see to it that the photos are accompanied with good descriptions and categorizations. This nomination is to the 'Boats' gallery without any mention of the boats on the file page. Please remember that (per the rules) documentation is just as important for an FP as the photo. I'm asking you kindly. --Cart (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you I.Mahesh for fixing this! :-) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I think I do generally do this, but yes, sure, you’re right Cmao20 (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Nice distribution of the various objects in the photo for me. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  12:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2025 at 11:57:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Marine
•  Info created by Hugo Graf, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Olivier LPB (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Very interesting Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support and thank you. Don't know why I didn't nominate this at the time, but I used to be a lot less organised about what had and hadn't been nominated on Commons, and the two nomination limit sometimes meant I'd forget about things. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 10:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 19:02:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
•  Info Created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Neutral I would expect more details and more sharpness. The composition is quite good, very good. --XRay 💬 11:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Weak support Nice view, maybe could do with a little more space on the left hand side to complete the curve of the shoreline Cmao20 (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

  Agreed, although the sunlight coming from behind the camera lights up the right side nicely. Tsays22 (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Comment I'm a little bit bothered by the magenta cast in the photo, it's not much but looking at the clouds it's there. --Cart (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 10:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2025 at 14:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
•  Info probably created by the Webster Brothers – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^(talk) 17:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Candidatas_a_imágenes_destacadas&oldid=810622495"

Category:

• Commons-es